2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.xphs.2016.05.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Support Tools in Formulation Development for Poorly Soluble Drugs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The selection of the best technology for enhanced absorption is related to numerous factors and variables reflecting the physicochemical properties, such as Log P and melting point, as supportive tools for formulation selection. In particular, API with a high melting point has a strong crystallization tendency, which is not suitable for ASD [7], and intestinal lymphatic transport of API on LBF is not even expected at low lipophilicity, log P < 5 [45]. TAK-020 exhibits an exotherm at high temperatures of around 300 • C, including melting, and it has relatively low lipophilicity (cLogP 2.0 calculated by Daylight version 4.95).…”
Section: Pk Profiling For Determining the Optimal Drug Formmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The selection of the best technology for enhanced absorption is related to numerous factors and variables reflecting the physicochemical properties, such as Log P and melting point, as supportive tools for formulation selection. In particular, API with a high melting point has a strong crystallization tendency, which is not suitable for ASD [7], and intestinal lymphatic transport of API on LBF is not even expected at low lipophilicity, log P < 5 [45]. TAK-020 exhibits an exotherm at high temperatures of around 300 • C, including melting, and it has relatively low lipophilicity (cLogP 2.0 calculated by Daylight version 4.95).…”
Section: Pk Profiling For Determining the Optimal Drug Formmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Known solubilized formulations, such as amorphous solid dispersion (ASD), lipid-based formulation (LBF) and cyclodextrin (CD) inclusion complex for improving the solubility; and nanocrystal (Nanocry) for improving the dissolution rate, also have limitations due to numerous concerns, such as difficulty of formulation preparation and manufacturability, inflexibility of dose, and instability of shelf life; success is not always achieved. Namely, to successfully enhance oral bioavailability of APIs, repeated trial and error is required, with these approaches still remaining a challenge [4,7]. Accordingly, other novel technologies for enhancing solubility, such as cocrystal, coamorphous, and nano-cocrystal systems have been studied to overcome the problem of low aqueous solubility in pharmaceutical drug development [5,[8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It challenges formulation process and could lead to difficulties with successful therapy (1). Formulation development strategies of poorly soluble drugs include particle size reduction, crystal modification, addition of surfactants, preparation of solid dispersions, or lipid formulations (2). API dissolution profile in time is a result of complex interactions including a physical form of API, presence and chemical character of excipients in the formulation, and preparation process parameters as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advantages of oral solid formulations are clear: high stability, dose accuracy, low production, and transportation costs, besides patient compliance. 1 Still, unsatisfactory physicochemical properties may compromise drug bioavailability. It is estimated that 75% of drug candidates to give rise to new medicines are poorly water soluble.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%