2022
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6501/aca217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Support vector machine fault diagnosis based on sparse scaling convex hull

Abstract: To solve the problem that the convex hull coverage model of the dataset cannot reflect the effective distribution of the samples and the feature dimension of the sample points is too high in the process of fault diagnosis. A Sparse Scaled Convex Hull (SSCH) based support vector machine classification method is proposed and applied to fault diagnosis of roller bearings. The dimensionality reduction of the features of the sample set is carried out by random forest (RF). Firstly, the optimized sample subsets are … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, to validate the more superior performance of the proposed method, six other approaches are also employed for rolling bearing fault diagnosis, including the EMD-CSvDE, VMD-CSvDE, SoVMD-multiscale sample entropy (MSE) [ 44 ], SoVMD-multiscale permutation entropy (MPE) [ 45 ], support vector machine (SVM) [ 46 ], and artificial neural network (ANN) [ 47 ]. More specifically, the first four comparison methods are designed to analyze the contribution of each link in the process of fault diagnosis, i.e., SoVMD-based multiscale frequency component extraction and CSvDE-based MsFFS construction.…”
Section: Experiments Validation and Results Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, to validate the more superior performance of the proposed method, six other approaches are also employed for rolling bearing fault diagnosis, including the EMD-CSvDE, VMD-CSvDE, SoVMD-multiscale sample entropy (MSE) [ 44 ], SoVMD-multiscale permutation entropy (MPE) [ 45 ], support vector machine (SVM) [ 46 ], and artificial neural network (ANN) [ 47 ]. More specifically, the first four comparison methods are designed to analyze the contribution of each link in the process of fault diagnosis, i.e., SoVMD-based multiscale frequency component extraction and CSvDE-based MsFFS construction.…”
Section: Experiments Validation and Results Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, machine learning-based methods for bearing multiclass fault diagnosis have become a hot research topic in the industry. However, traditional machine learning methods such as artificial neural networks [6], random forests [7], and support vector machines [8] learn only shallow features for bearing fault characteristics [9], which are not suitable for highdimensional data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%