2012
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2894201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Support Vector Machines with Evolutionary Feature Selection for Default Prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this method, to properly assess the decision function, the separator function or indeed the regression function, the data which has labels or goals is used to learn. Forward to training with sufficient data, machine learning, instance SVM, could be used to predict or identify what decisions have been made if new data is entered and also the result is unspecified [10]. Unless the performance either at time of testing by itself doesn't perform as expected, the parameters of the machine learning function can be modified to boost the accuracy of the model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this method, to properly assess the decision function, the separator function or indeed the regression function, the data which has labels or goals is used to learn. Forward to training with sufficient data, machine learning, instance SVM, could be used to predict or identify what decisions have been made if new data is entered and also the result is unspecified [10]. Unless the performance either at time of testing by itself doesn't perform as expected, the parameters of the machine learning function can be modified to boost the accuracy of the model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results indicated that using the rough set in initial variable selection increased prediction accuracy Angelini et alYeh et al employed a rough set and the RF to create a credit rating model featuring high prediction accuracy, and then added DEA to compare the operating efficiency among variables used in forecasting. The results indicated that after DEA was added, the forecasting accuracy was 88%; when only financial data were added, the forecasting accuracy was 76%, revealing that twostep forecasting exhibits superior performanceHärdle et al (2012) SVM BPN Rough set Fuzzy theory Härdle et al combined rough set and fuzzy theory to perform variable selection, and then added the SVM to determine the optimal hyperplane before create credit rating classification. The results indicated that the rough set yielded the highest forecasting rate, 89.42%, followed by SVM, which yielded an 87.72% forecasting rate, and then BPN, which yielded an 81.Cheng integrated the KMV model and DD with financial variables to analyze credit rating by using the RF.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, the researcher could be using kind of heuristics and metaheuristics optimization [19][20][21][22]. In addition, the split of training and testing data has also influenced the accuracy of the model, such as the percentage 90:10, 80:20, 70:30, 60:40, and 50:50 [23][24][25][26]. On the other hand, there are some techniques to separate the training and testing data using the K fold [27,28].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%