Supporting academic publication: Evaluation of a writing course combined with writers’ support group

Abstract

Publication rates are a vital measure of individual and institutional performance, yet many nurse academics publish rarely or not at all. Despite widespread acceptance of the need to increase academic publication rates and the pressure university faculty may experience to fulfil this obligation, little is known about the effectiveness of practical strategies to support academic writing. In this small cohort study (n=8) comprising nurses and other professionals involved in university education, a questionnaire survey was used to evaluate the effectiveness of a one-week "Writing for Publication" course combined with a monthly writers support group to increase publication rates. Two year pre and post submissions increased from 9 to 33 articles in peer-reviewed journals. Publications (in print) per person increased from a baseline of 0.5-1.2 per year. Participants reported increased writing confidence and greater satisfaction with the publishing process. Peer support and receiving recognition and encouragement from line managers were also cited as incentives to publish. Writing for publication is a skill that can be learned. The evaluated model of a formal writing course, followed by informal monthly group support meetings, can effectively increase publication rates.

A systematic review highlights a knowledge gap regarding the effectiveness of health-related training programs in journalology

“…jclinepi.com), the only RCT, a multicenter trial [18], took place in the United States and Brazil, whereas both CCTs [19,20] took place in the United States. The nine remaining BA studies included six [21e26] conducted in the United States, one in Canada [27], and another one in Australia [28]. One study's location [29] was unclear but appeared to take place in Australia.…”

Outcomes of a mentored research competition for authoring pediatric case reports in chiropractic

“…Several methods have been used to increase the publication rate of faculty and clinicians, including support groups, 6,7 writing workshops and support groups, 8 writing coaches, 9 and peer mentoring. 10 We chose to use the mentor model, since the DICCP clinicians were geographically distant.…”

Mentoring and coaching in promoting publications in the Department of Physiotherapy at a local university in South Africa

“…The pre set time slot with the structure of the workshop had however been experienced as positive, as it assisted the participants to complete an article. Setting aside dedicated time was also identified by Rhoda et al (2006) as an important sense of confidence and facilitated the acquisition of new skills that will assist them in moving forward, both as authors and reviewers.…”

“…Rickard et al (2008), highlighted that multiple researchers in a group with a variety of perspectives proved to be a strength. However, Grzybowski, Bates, Calam et al (2003) reported that not all writers were comfortable with receiving feedback from fellow professionals.…”