2018
DOI: 10.1002/jts.22288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supporting Asylum Seekers: Clinician Experiences of Documenting Human Rights Violations Through Forensic Psychological Evaluation

Abstract: The United States permits foreign nationals to apply for asylum if they have experienced persecution or have a fear of future persecution. In order to meet the criteria for persecution, the harm inflicted upon the asylum seeker does not need to be or have been physical and can include psychological sequelae. In an effort to document persecution, lawyers seek the assistance of health professionals when preparing their clients' asylum applications. Mental health professionals work to corroborate psychological ev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This systematic review describes the complexity and variation in medical-legal partnerships for im/migrant populations in the United States. The overwhelming observation of the review is the significance of these partnerships to improve legal outcomes; ten out of ten articles that discussed the delivery of medical knowledge to legal cases described how people were more likely to receive positive legal outcomes when medical professionals contribute to legal proceedings [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. The legitimatization of trauma and persecution through medical professionals in legal spaces may also be crucial for protecting the lives of migrants who have suffered greatly in both sending and receiving communities alike [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This systematic review describes the complexity and variation in medical-legal partnerships for im/migrant populations in the United States. The overwhelming observation of the review is the significance of these partnerships to improve legal outcomes; ten out of ten articles that discussed the delivery of medical knowledge to legal cases described how people were more likely to receive positive legal outcomes when medical professionals contribute to legal proceedings [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. The legitimatization of trauma and persecution through medical professionals in legal spaces may also be crucial for protecting the lives of migrants who have suffered greatly in both sending and receiving communities alike [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A growing amount of literature has been focusing on forms of violence and distress that continue and arise after migration and during resettlement. In the U.S., many refugee groups continue to face barriers due to racial and ethnic discrimination, restrictive immigration policies, limited English proficiency, limited social support, and economic insecurity, leaving many with limited options for employment, education, affordable housing, health care insurance, and other opportunities [ 9 , 47 50 ]. Accessing health care services can be particularly challenging due to barriers in transportation, translation, and cost, exacerbating the existing effects of trauma on increased risk of PTSD and increased risk of chronic diseases such as diabetes and hypertension [ 49 , 51 ].…”
Section: Post-migration Traumamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While engaging in this work, however, there is an increased risk of secondary trauma: among clinicians who provide evaluations for immigrants seeking asylum in the U.S., 26.2% report experiencing vicarious trauma from their work [16]. Clinicians report feelings of isolation associated with their work with immigrants, as they may feel as if others are unable or unwilling to learn about the impact this work may have on the clinician [17]. There has been less research, however, on lawyers and legal volunteers working with asylum seekers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%