2010 IEEE 34th Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference Workshops 2010
DOI: 10.1109/compsacw.2010.63
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supporting Concern-Based Regression Testing and Prioritization in a Model-Driven Environment

Abstract: Abstract-Traditional regression testing and prioritization approaches are bottom-up (or white-box). They rely on the analysis of the impact of changes in source code artifacts, identifying corresponding parts of software to retest. While effective in minimizing the amount of testing required to validate code changes, they do not leverage on specificationlevel design and requirements concerns that motivated these changes. Model-based testing approaches support a top-down (or black box) testing approach, where d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Web service structure and conditions for service rules are represented using UML and OCL, respectively. Filho et al [16] used tool for test case generation and prioritisation based on UML. Naslavsky et al [17] generated test cases using traceability links and representing sequence diagrams as control flow graphs.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Web service structure and conditions for service rules are represented using UML and OCL, respectively. Filho et al [16] used tool for test case generation and prioritisation based on UML. Naslavsky et al [17] generated test cases using traceability links and representing sequence diagrams as control flow graphs.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Filho et al [16] comparison of UML model based on traceability links, userdefined critical paths, data coverage and path coverage unable to identify all the changes including behaviour and specifications 7.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%