2011 IEEE/ACM 12th International Conference on Grid Computing 2011
DOI: 10.1109/grid.2011.29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supporting Deadline Constrained Distributed Computations on Grids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, although the computational overhead of reasoning in the system is far below the benefit of doing it, we want to explore opportunities for explicitly balancing the overhead involved in reasoning against the quality of the schedule required. We hope to build on our previous work implementing a tuner facility for balancing the computational cost of creating fine-grained processor schedules against the cost of carrying out the actual computations [21]. The tuner carries out meta-level resource balancing between the reason and the computations being reasoned about; its parameters can be set manually or be set to self-tune at run-time in response to observations about the ongoing computation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, although the computational overhead of reasoning in the system is far below the benefit of doing it, we want to explore opportunities for explicitly balancing the overhead involved in reasoning against the quality of the schedule required. We hope to build on our previous work implementing a tuner facility for balancing the computational cost of creating fine-grained processor schedules against the cost of carrying out the actual computations [21]. The tuner carries out meta-level resource balancing between the reason and the computations being reasoned about; its parameters can be set manually or be set to self-tune at run-time in response to observations about the ongoing computation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our previous work, we have constructed DREAM a (Distributed Resource Estimation and Allocation Model) [20] and related mechanisms [21] for reasoning about scheduling of deadline constrained concurrent computations over parallel and distributed execution environments. In the most recent work [22], this approach have been repurposed to achieve dynamic load balancing for computations which do not constrained by deadlines.…”
Section: Reasoning About Multicore Energy Consumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our previous work, we have shown that this approach can be effective in achieving timeliness goals of computations [35]; here, we show that a similar approach -prioritizing message deliveries based on bounded knowledge of the computations they would lead to -can also improve overall performance of the system even in the absence of timeliness requirements. Particularly, we attempt to expedite delivery of the messages which would lead to computations which in turn would send messages of their own; these messages are potential bottlenecks.…”
Section: Fine-grained Resource Managementmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Note that this function preserves the form of MWM+ (5) with the modification motivated by optimal weights in (6). Indeed, the fraction 1 1+dij(t)−t is similar to p ij (t) since 1/p ij (t) is the expected deadline of a packet in the formulation of the previous section.…”
Section: A Weight Functionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The applicability of deadline aware scheduling algorithms reaches as far as grid computation, in which threads much be adaptively scheduled to optimize distributed computation [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%