Supporting employees with chronic conditions to stay at work: perspectives of occupational health professionals and organizational representatives

Abstract

Background Supporting employees with chronic conditions can prevent work-related problems and facilitate sustainable employment. Various stakeholders are involved in providing support to these employees. Understanding their current practices and experienced barriers is useful for the development of an organizational-level intervention to improve this support. The aim of this study was to explore the current practices of occupational physicians and organizational representatives, identifying both barriers to providing support and opportunities for improvement. Methods Two focus groups with sixteen occupational physicians and seven semi-structured interviews with organizational representatives were held between January and June 2018. Data was analyzed using thematic content analysis. Results Several barriers to offer support were identified, including barriers at the organizational level (negative organizational attitudes towards employees with chronic conditions), the employee level (employees’ reluctance to collaborate with employers in dealing with work-related problems), and in the collaboration between occupational physicians and organizational representatives. In addition, barriers in occupational health care were described, e.g. occupational physicians’ lack of visibility and a lack of utilization of occupational physicians’ support. Opportunities to optimize support included a shared responsibility of all stakeholders involved, actively anchoring prevention of work-related problems in policy and practice and a more pronounced role of the health care sector in preventing work-related problems. Conclusions Preventing work-related problems for employees with chronic conditions can be achieved by addressing the identified barriers to provide support. In addition, both occupational physicians and organizational representatives should initiate and secure preventive support at the organizational level and in occupational health care. These insights are helpful in developing an intervention aimed at supporting employees with chronic conditions to stay at work.

Barriers and facilitators to return to work following cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative research

“…Furthermore, Reibis et al highlights, in a review addressing determinants of reintegration of patients experiencing acute coronary syndrome, a need to pay special attention towards patients with physically demanding jobs and how stepwise reintegration is a supportive return-to-work strategy 10. Additionally, we found that acceptance and understanding from colleagues and employers are beneficial for work resumption, which corresponds well with other studies showing that social relations at the workplace are important for re-employment 41…”

“… 10 Additionally, we found that acceptance and understanding from colleagues and employers are beneficial for work resumption, which corresponds well with other studies showing that social relations at the workplace are important for re-employment. 41 …”

A Context Analysis with Stakeholders’ Views for Future Implementation of Interventions to Prevent Health Problems Among Employees with a Lower Socioeconomic Position

“…Thus, collaboration between these two domains needs improvement. To improve the collaboration, the first step is to raise awareness among GPs on the relation between health complaints and work, to train GPs to be more able to discuss work-related problems, and to refer patients more easily to an OP [ 28 , 31 , 32 , 34 ]. The second step is to explore initiatives to improve the collaboration, by for example addressing misconceptions between GPs and OPs roles and independence of OPs and how to reach and communicate effectively with each other [ 31 ].…”

Management of Chronic Musculoskeletal Disorders in the Workplace from the Perspective of Older Employees: A Mixed Methods Research Study

“…In addition, employees in this study perceived that managers were “at odds” with the government’s recommendations, mainly due to a lack of knowledge concerning laws and regulations. An underlying cause for this conflict may be the complexity and the ambiguity of the published guidelines, combined with the manager’s limited experience in dealing with the current changes in employment laws and policies [ 107 , 121 ]. Another important finding was that the manager was not always aware of the relevant resources, services or useful strategies that could be applied in the workplace.…”