Supporting implementation of interventions to address ethnicity-related health inequities: frameworks, facilitators and barriers – a scoping review protocol

Abstract

IntroductionHealth inequities are differences in health between groups of people that are avoidable, unfair and unjust. Achieving equitable health outcomes requires approaches that recognise and account for the differences in levels of advantage between groups. Implementation science, which studies how to translate evidence-based interventions into routine practice, is increasingly recognised as an approach to address health inequities by identifying factors and processes that enable equitable implementation of interventions. This article describes the protocol for a scoping review of the literature relating to the equitable implementation of interventions, focusing on ethnicity-related health inequities. The scoping review aims to identify equity-focused implementation science theories, models and frameworks (TMFs) and to synthesise and analyse the evidence relating to the factors that aid or inhibit equitable implementation of health interventions.Methods and analysisThe scoping review is guided by the methodology developed by Arksey and O’Malley and enhanced by Levac and colleagues. Relevant literature will be identified by searching electronic databases, grey literature, hand-searching key journals and searching the reference lists and citations of studies that meet the inclusion criteria. We will focus on literature published from 2011 to the present. Titles, abstracts and full-text articles will be screened independently by two researchers; any disagreements will be resolved through discussion with another researcher. Extracted data will be summarised and analysed to address the scoping review aims.Ethics and disseminationThe scoping review will map the available literature on equity-focused implementation science TMFs and the facilitators and barriers to equitable implementation of interventions. Ethical approval is not required. Dissemination of the results of the review will include publications in peer-review journals and conference and stakeholder presentations. Findings from the review will support those implementing interventions to ensure that the implementation pathway and processes are equitable, thereby improving health outcomes and reducing existing inequities.

Understanding access barriers to care in diabetic eye disease for underserved patients in Alabama: An expert interview study

“…Overall, access barriers identi ed in Alabama are similar to health equity barriers documented in the literature in other therapeutic areas [10]. These factors include (1) patients, such as their lack of rapport with clinicians; (2) the clinical encounter, which includes the patient-provider interaction and all communication during that visit; and (3) the health care system, such as the lack of system to improve quality in the delivery of health care services [7].…”

Navigating grey areas in HIV and mental health implementation science

“…HIV clinics) could overcome the limited success of previous approaches and expand service delivery options. Application of IS frameworks that focus on equity [90, 91] or include contextual features distinctive in low‐ or middle‐income countries [92] could advance HIV/MH implementation research by redirecting scientific inquiry to novel implementation strategies, novel doses of these strategies or combinations of strategies. Proctor and colleagues [93] and Crable and colleagues [94] provide additional guidance for addressing this grey area.…”