2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-39952-2_21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supporting Multi-objective Decision Making Within a Supervisory Control Environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the last few years, some works have proposed UAV simulation environments for supervisory flight control [ 10 ], coordination [ 11 ] or training [ 12 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last few years, some works have proposed UAV simulation environments for supervisory flight control [ 10 ], coordination [ 11 ] or training [ 12 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of system analysis, a phased action plan has been developed that is used to achieve global goals [12,13]. In the process of system analysis, patterns of typical situations and reactions have been highlighted to support decision-making [14,15]. In addition to analyze information on the activities of NBFIs, effective decision support requires a comprehensive review of the organizational and system-level characteristics [16,17], while safety aspects must be taken into account [18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Palinko, Kun, Shyrokov, & Heeman (2010) collected pupillary data from participants engaged in a driving task and found strong agreement between performance data and pupillary data, suggesting that cognitive load can be inferred via eye tracking data within a realistic environment. Additionally, Sibley, Coyne, Doddi, & Jasper (2015) used eye tracking within an unmanned aerial vehicle operator simulation environment and found increased pupil size associated with increased processing demands, in addition to larger standard deviations in the pupil sizes of poor performers compared to high task performers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%