Supporting Multiple Perspectives on 3D Museum Artefacts through Interoperable Annotations

Abstract

International audienceIncreasing numbers of museums and cultural institutions are using 3D laser scanning techniques to preserve cultural artefacts as 3D digital models, that are then accessible to curators, scholars and the general public via Web interfaces to online galleries. Museums are finding the cost of providing metadata for such collections prohibitive and are keen to explore how they might exploit Web 2.0 social tagging and annotation services to capture community knowledge and enrich the contextual metadata associated with their collections. Although there exist some annotation services for 3D objects, they are designed for specific disciplines, not Web-based or depend on proprietary software and formats. The majority also only support the attachment of annotations to whole objects - not points, 3D surface regions or 3D segments. This paper describes the 3DSA (3D Semantic Annotation) system developed at the University of Queensland that enables users to attach annotations to 3D digital artefacts. The 3DSA system is based on a common interoperable annotation model (the Open Annotations Collaboration (OAC) model) and uses ontology-based tags to support further semantic annotation and reasoning. This common approach enables annotations to be re-used, migrated and shared - across annotation clients and across different 3D and 2.5D digital representations of the one cultural artifact. Such interoperability is essential if cultural institutions are to easily harness knowledge from a broad range of users, including curators, students and remote Indigenous communities, with different client capabilities

Comparison of engagement and emotional responses of older and younger adults interacting with 3D cultural heritage artefacts on personal devices

“…Regarding the digitisation of museum objects, past studies considered the methods used for creating 3D models of museum artefacts (Bruno et al 2010;Hunter and Yu 2010;Fang et al 2008) and creating interactive content or virtual museums (Wojciechowski 2012;Kim et al 2011;Petridis et al 2005). They have also used these 3D models in AR guides and games (Chang et al 2014;Chatzidimitris et al 2013;Miyashita et al 2008) within the museum.…”

Semantic annotation services for 3D models of cultural heritage artefacts

“…The majority of 3D annotation applications only support annotations to whole objects, points [44,65,123], pre-defined segments (not freely defined by users) [20] and simple primitive shapes (e.g., boxes, ellipsoids and planes with sketches) [106,131,130]. These solutions do not support the ability to attach annotations to interactively-defined sub parts of 3D museum objects.…”