Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Background The use of unlicensed medicines has been associated with safety concerns, availability and accessibility issues, and lack of integrated care across care settings. Objective To understand the interaction between the views and experiences of those who prescribe, those who supply and those who receive unlicensed “special” medicines, so that factors affecting the patient journey and successful treatment can be identified and used to inform areas for change. Methods A qualitative, phenomenological approach was adopted, with semi-structured interviews with prescribers, community pharmacy staff and patients. A combination of stratified, purposive, snowball and convenience sampling was used to identify participants. Interviews were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis and the findings were integrated using an adapted model of the Pillar Integration Process. Results Three pillars were constructed after synthesising results from interviews with patients (n=4), prescribers (n=5) and pharmacy staff (n=6): the awareness of licensing status; perceptions of patient care and acceptability of unlicensed medicine use; and challenges associated with the accessibility of unlicensed medicines. The varying levels of awareness when unlicensed medicines are prescribed and the varying perceptions of responsibility and acceptability of the use of unlicensed medicines help to explain the challenges faced by participants across the patient journey, Challenges identified included understanding what unlicensed medicines are, awareness of the licensing status when unlicensed medicines are prescribed, managing care across care settings to ensure the patient is effectively treated and ensuring continuity of care for patients in the community. Conclusion The results highlight a clear need for more integrated care and support for prescribers to reduce the chances of delays between care settings, and more patient-centred care to ensure that any delays when accessing medicines do not lead to treatment disruption for the patient. The new national guidelines informed by findings of this study can support policy-makers across the globe.
Background The use of unlicensed medicines has been associated with safety concerns, availability and accessibility issues, and lack of integrated care across care settings. Objective To understand the interaction between the views and experiences of those who prescribe, those who supply and those who receive unlicensed “special” medicines, so that factors affecting the patient journey and successful treatment can be identified and used to inform areas for change. Methods A qualitative, phenomenological approach was adopted, with semi-structured interviews with prescribers, community pharmacy staff and patients. A combination of stratified, purposive, snowball and convenience sampling was used to identify participants. Interviews were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis and the findings were integrated using an adapted model of the Pillar Integration Process. Results Three pillars were constructed after synthesising results from interviews with patients (n=4), prescribers (n=5) and pharmacy staff (n=6): the awareness of licensing status; perceptions of patient care and acceptability of unlicensed medicine use; and challenges associated with the accessibility of unlicensed medicines. The varying levels of awareness when unlicensed medicines are prescribed and the varying perceptions of responsibility and acceptability of the use of unlicensed medicines help to explain the challenges faced by participants across the patient journey, Challenges identified included understanding what unlicensed medicines are, awareness of the licensing status when unlicensed medicines are prescribed, managing care across care settings to ensure the patient is effectively treated and ensuring continuity of care for patients in the community. Conclusion The results highlight a clear need for more integrated care and support for prescribers to reduce the chances of delays between care settings, and more patient-centred care to ensure that any delays when accessing medicines do not lead to treatment disruption for the patient. The new national guidelines informed by findings of this study can support policy-makers across the globe.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.