12th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC'05) 2005
DOI: 10.1109/apsec.2005.100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supporting predictive change impact analysis: a control call graph based technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed approach is called CCGImpact and implemented in the PCIA tool. However, their approach does not yet consider object oriented specifities [31], such as inheritance.…”
Section: ) Call Graphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The proposed approach is called CCGImpact and implemented in the PCIA tool. However, their approach does not yet consider object oriented specifities [31], such as inheritance.…”
Section: ) Call Graphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal of the work presented by Badri et al [31] is to increase the precision of call graph based change prediction while keeping the analysis costs on a moderate level. Therefore, they combine static call graphs with static control flow information to so called Control Flow Graphs, to overcome the lack of precision of traditional call graph based approaches.…”
Section: ) Call Graphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Badri et al [3] use the so-called control call graph in which nodes which do not influence the execution of the procedure calls are left out. This approach is similar to ours in that it also considers procedure level dependencies for impact analysis purposes.…”
Section: Other Relevant Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An approach called CCGImpact, which is implemented in PCIA, was proposed by Badri et al [19], who sought to improve the call graph's accuracy in predicting changes and to keep costs low. Thus, the static call graphs were combined with static control flow information, thereby addressing the lack of precision of traditional call graph-based approaches.…”
Section: Static Dependency Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%