Supporting rehabilitation stakeholders in making service delivery decisions: a rapid review of multi-criteria decision analysis methods

Cahill, Peter; Reitzel, Meaghan; Anaby, Dana; Camden, Chantal; Phoenix, Michelle; Romoff, Shelley; Campbell, William E.

doi:10.1080/09638288.2022.2080285

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 78 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…MCDM stands as one of the most widely used decision methodologies across various fields, including energy and environment, business, economy, material selection, computer software selection, etc. [ 7 , 8 ]. Its application in biomedical engineering and healthcare is not a new approach and provides highly beneficial for medical professionals, patients, engineers and others in the field [ 9 , 10 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Functional recovery prediction during rehabilitation after rotator cuff tears by decision support system

Adomavičienė,

Daunoravičienė,

Kazakevičiūtė-Januškevičienė

et al. 2024

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Today’s rehabilitation decision-making still relies on conventional methods and different specific targeted rehabilitation protocols. Our study focuses on the decision support system for early rehabilitation after rotator cuff (RC) tears repair, where a multicriteria decision-making framework (MCDM) is applied for the prediction of successful functional recovery and selection of a rehabilitation protocol. Objective To identify factors that affect recovery outcomes and to develop a decision support system methodology for predicting functional recovery outcomes at early rehabilitation after RC repair. Methods Twelve rehabilitation experts were involved in the design, calibration, and evaluation of a rehabilitation protocol based on the proposed decision support system constructed using the MCDM framework. For the development of a decision support system, 20 patients after RC surgery undergoing outpatient rehabilitation were enrolled in a prospective cohort clinical trial. Results The MCDM framework (SWARA method) sensitively assesses different criteria and determines the corresponding criteria weights that were similar to criteria weights assessed subjectively by rehabilitation experts. The assignment of patients into the classes, according to the heuristic evaluation method based on expert opinion and the standard qualitative evaluation methods showed the validity of MCDM methods remain the best new alternative in predicting recovery during rehabilitation Conclusions The results of this paper show that sustainable rehabilitation is an area that is quite suitable for the use of MCDM. The most of rehabilitation protocols are based on traditional methods and approaches, but the sensitive results showed the validity of MCDM methods and remains the best new alternative in prediction recovery protocols during rehabilitation.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Functional recovery prediction during rehabilitation after rotator cuff tears by decision support system

Adomavičienė,

Daunoravičienė,

Kazakevičiūtė-Januškevičienė

et al. 2024

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Moving Beyond Rapport: The Importance of Active Facilitation of Therapeutic Alliance in Adult Acquired Brain Injury Rehabilitation

Sohlberg,

O'Neil-Pirozzi,

Ness

et al. 2024

Am J Speech Lang Pathol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: Therapeutic alliance (TA) is critical to rehabilitation outcomes for adults with acquired brain injuries (ABIs). The purpose of this viewpoint article is to review factors that contribute to TA and to suggest ways speech-language pathologists (SLPs) can integrate these factors into their ABI rehabilitation practice. Method: We evaluated literature describing client and clinician factors shown to affect—or not affect—TA in ABI rehabilitation and mapped findings onto suggested practices that SLPs may use to actively promote TA with their clients. Informed by our findings and TA frameworks, we integrated findings into a novel clinician self-reflection tool: the Therapeutic Alliance Reflection Checklist. Conclusions: TA is a key ingredient in ABI rehabilitation. We contend that SLPs can, and should, actively facilitate TA with clients; the self-reflection checklist can assist. We advocate for continued TA research and improved measurement across rehabilitation settings. We further contend that training in active TA-promoting skills is a critical component of speech-language pathology education.

show abstract

References

2024

The Multilevel Community Engagement Model

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Supporting rehabilitation stakeholders in making service delivery decisions: a rapid review of multi-criteria decision analysis methods

Cited by 4 publications

References 78 publications

Functional recovery prediction during rehabilitation after rotator cuff tears by decision support system

Functional recovery prediction during rehabilitation after rotator cuff tears by decision support system

Moving Beyond Rapport: The Importance of Active Facilitation of Therapeutic Alliance in Adult Acquired Brain Injury Rehabilitation

References

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About