Supporting relatives of adults with chronic mental illness in the community: A comparative evaluation of two groups

Mitchell, Fraser; Ralston, George; McInnes, J.; Crilly, Elise; Anderson, Jacqueline

doi:10.1080/09503159808411500

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Introduction1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2016

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Mitchell et al 1998;Kane and Bamford 2003;Slack and Webber 2007). It may be that academics undertake a role of supporting authors to 'scholar up' the original research for publication.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Good Practice in the Conduct and Reporting of Practitioner Research: Reflections from Social Work And Social Care

Lunt¹,

Shaw

2016

Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper examines two distinct forms of practitioner research and makes tentative suggestions around what may constitute good practice in their conduct and reporting, and for the genre of practitioner research as a whole. We also explore their potential benefits and limitations within the wider set of research approaches. Discussion is informed primarily by an earlier review of practitioner research in adult social care and supplemented by knowledge and experience of wider activities related to practitioner research. Discussion is organised in three parts. First, we explore what are generic good practices around all forms of practitioner research. Second, we move to identify particular forms of good practice within what we call Type 1 and Type 2 practitioner research, situating them alongside a practitioner research matrix of stakeholder benefits. Third, we consider the implications of such discussion for how we best stimulate these types of practitioner research.

show abstract

“…Mitchell et al 1998;Kane and Bamford 2003;Slack and Webber 2007). It may be that academics undertake a role of supporting authors to 'scholar up' the original research for publication.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Good Practice in the Conduct and Reporting of Practitioner Research: Reflections from Social Work And Social Care

Lunt¹,

Shaw

2016

Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Supporting relatives of adults with chronic mental illness in the community: A comparative evaluation of two groups

Cited by 1 publication

References 10 publications

Good Practice in the Conduct and Reporting of Practitioner Research: Reflections from Social Work And Social Care

Good Practice in the Conduct and Reporting of Practitioner Research: Reflections from Social Work And Social Care

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About