2024
DOI: 10.1186/s12912-023-01659-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supporting self-management in women with pre-existing diabetes in pregnancy: a mixed-methods sequential comparative case study

Katelyn Sushko,
Patricia Strachan,
Michelle Butt
et al.

Abstract: Introduction Maternal glycemia is associated with pregnancy outcomes. Thus, supporting the self-management experiences and preferences of pregnant women with type 1 and type 2 diabetes is crucial to optimize glucose control and perinatal outcomes. Research design and methods This paper describes the mixed methods integration of a sequential comparative case study. The objectives are threefold, as we integrated the quantitative and qualitative data… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 38 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study had three objectives: (1) to determine the predictors of glycaemic control during pregnancy; (2) to understand the experience and diabetes self-management support needs during pregnancy among people with pre-existing diabetes and (3) to assess how self-management and support experiences help to explain glycaemic control among women with preexisting diabetes in pregnancy. A four-phased mixed-methods sequential comparative case study was used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study had three objectives: (1) to determine the predictors of glycaemic control during pregnancy; (2) to understand the experience and diabetes self-management support needs during pregnancy among people with pre-existing diabetes and (3) to assess how self-management and support experiences help to explain glycaemic control among women with preexisting diabetes in pregnancy. A four-phased mixed-methods sequential comparative case study was used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%