2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01184.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supporting social awareness in collaborative e‐learning

Abstract: In the last decade, we have seen the emergence of virtual learning environments. Initially, these environments were a little more than document repositories that tutor used unicast to the students. Informed in part by social constructivist theories of education, later environments included capabilities for tutor-student and student-student, synchronous and asynchronous communication. The initial research of this paper reports the typical low usage of these capabilities. The main research attempted to ameliorat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
47
2
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
47
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The flexible contents are easily handled by the instructor, based on the student's needs or situations, such as tests, assignments, discussions, etc., whereas the pre-recorded contents are a rigid set of information and are inflexible, including streaming the contents on the media, directing a learner down a specific path of learning outcomes. Blended learning, as a more learner-centered educational approach, allows for communication, collaboration and interaction [39][40][41], as well as flexibility for the instructor to overcome the drawbacks of the unilateral transfer of information, lack of interaction, isolation, etc. [42].…”
Section: Blended-learning and Mixed Contentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flexible contents are easily handled by the instructor, based on the student's needs or situations, such as tests, assignments, discussions, etc., whereas the pre-recorded contents are a rigid set of information and are inflexible, including streaming the contents on the media, directing a learner down a specific path of learning outcomes. Blended learning, as a more learner-centered educational approach, allows for communication, collaboration and interaction [39][40][41], as well as flexibility for the instructor to overcome the drawbacks of the unilateral transfer of information, lack of interaction, isolation, etc. [42].…”
Section: Blended-learning and Mixed Contentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We collected the students' records of the time-on-task with the EuroCAT tool (Lambropoulos, Faulkner, & Culwin, 2011;Romero & Demeure, 2010), which not only supported the definition of the students' weekly temporal engagement in their online education but also their professional activities. Student time flexibility was defined as the number of different times in a day the student could engage in the learning activity.…”
Section: Context and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the course under study, the above "episode posts" were identified using a method found in the literature (Lambropoulos et al, 2012) You find below the applied grid of analysis of "episode posts" that includes different types of interaction with the related description. The above method has been applied to analyse the posts in the fora of all modules including recovery modules (Rec.…”
Section: B-online Course Dissemination Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore the analysis of innovative posts ("Episode") was carried out using a customized method taken from the literature on the subject (Lambropoulos et al, 2012). Therefore, the present research work attempted mainly to: (i) review the conceptual developments in forms of peer learning and community of practice under Alumni network environment (ii): provide insights about the extents of Alumni Network and Peer Learning under Ciheam MAI of Bari experience follow-up online course and (iii) highlight the effectiveness of "collaborative" method applied in eLearning courses in combination of Alumni Network in facilitating peer learning process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%