2012 IEEE International Conference on Embedded and Real-Time Computing Systems and Applications 2012
DOI: 10.1109/rtcsa.2012.55
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supporting Soft Real-Time Parallel Applications on Multicore Processors

Abstract: The prevalence of multicore processors has resulted in the wider applicability of parallel programming models such as OpenMP and MapReduce. A common goal of running parallel applications implemented under such models is to guarantee bounded response times while maximizing system utilization. Unfortunately, little previous work has been done that can provide such performance guarantees. In this paper, this problem is addressed by applying soft real-time scheduling analysis techniques. Analysis and conditions ar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A capacity augmentation bound of 4 − 2 m was proved in [35] for tasks with for implicit deadlines. Liu et al [36] provide a response time analysis for G-EDF.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A capacity augmentation bound of 4 − 2 m was proved in [35] for tasks with for implicit deadlines. Liu et al [36] provide a response time analysis for G-EDF.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many strategies for parallel synchronous tasks decompose parallel tasks into sets of sequential tasks [1,[13][14][15][16]. Without decomposition, researchers have studied both synchronous tasks [17] and general DAG tasks [18][19][20][21][22]. For hard real-time tasks with worst-case parameters, the best capacity augmentation bound known for general DAGs is 2 using federated scheduling (a partition-like strategy) without decomposition [2]; 2.6 using GEDF without decomposition [2]; 3.73 for rate-monotonic with and without decompostion [1,2]; and 3.42 for a more restricted class of synchronous tasks [13].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lateness guarantees also have been studied for GEDF-like scheduling [28]. For parallel tasks, Liu et al [18] for the first time provide a soft real-time response time analysis for GEDF.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many theoretical scheduling algorithms have been designed and analyzed for various task models in both hard real time [9, 10, 16, 26-30, 35, 37] and soft real time [32,36] contexts. There has not been as much work on building platforms that support real-time parallelism.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%