2020
DOI: 10.1037/neu0000602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supporting strategic processes can improve time-based prospective memory in the laboratory among older adults with HIV disease.

Abstract: Older adults living with HIV have trouble "remembering to remember," which affects their abilities to live independently and follow health care provider instructions. This experiment demonstrates that older HIVϩ adults can improve their memory performance in the laboratory by using specific strategies that reduce the cognitive demands of remembering to remember. Future studies using more naturalistic memory methods will determine whether similar improvements in remembering to remember can be achieved in the da… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
37
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 3 shows a mean response lag of Ϯ5 min for the two auditory alarm groups, suggesting that even though participant's responses were commonly early or late, the salient cue was nevertheless effective at activating the intention and promoting its execution. However, PM accuracy in the auditory alarm groups (i.e., cue detection and combination) was only ϳ60% in this naturalistic study, which is considerably lower than the 95% PM accuracy rates observed in the laboratory using parallel methods with these same participants (Woods et al, 2020). It possible that some participants heard the alarm but did not subsequently complete the PM task, because research indicates that even brief interruptions in between the activation and execution of a PM cue can lead to forgetting (Dismukes, 2012).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 3 shows a mean response lag of Ϯ5 min for the two auditory alarm groups, suggesting that even though participant's responses were commonly early or late, the salient cue was nevertheless effective at activating the intention and promoting its execution. However, PM accuracy in the auditory alarm groups (i.e., cue detection and combination) was only ϳ60% in this naturalistic study, which is considerably lower than the 95% PM accuracy rates observed in the laboratory using parallel methods with these same participants (Woods et al, 2020). It possible that some participants heard the alarm but did not subsequently complete the PM task, because research indicates that even brief interruptions in between the activation and execution of a PM cue can lead to forgetting (Dismukes, 2012).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…checking, which is one of the primary means of strategic monitoring for time-based PM (Woods et al, 2020). In this naturalistic study, we did not see any effect of supporting cue detection (or any phase of PM) on clock checking behavior.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The study procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Boards at the University of California San Diego (UCSD) and University of Houston. The parent study sample was comprised of 217 individuals age 50 and older (M ¼ 57.9, SD ¼ 6.6) enrolled in an NIH-funded investigation of PM at the UCSD HIV Neurobehavioral Research Program, which recruits from community-based organizations, local clinics, and regional advertisements (see Woods et al, 2020). The age cutoff of 50 was used for inclusion because 1) HIV disease may accelerate cognitive changes associated with aging processes (Kamkwalala & Newhouse, 2017), and 2) the largest percentage of older adults with HIV fall between ages 50 and 54 (CDC, 2018).…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%