2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2017.01.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supporting system interference on aerodynamic characteristics of an aircraft model in a low-speed wind tunnel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analysis of the measured aerodynamic coefficients from the point of symmetry was done for two Mach 0.25 runs of the ONERA M4 model in the modelupright and model-inverted positions [24] [25]. A good repeatability of the results of a model testing at φ = 0° and φ = 180° (Figure 24) is established, the deviations being attributed to the uncertainty of the internal balance used, which, because of the mechanical design of the model, had to be an assembled, Task-type one with accuracy somewhat lower than that of monolithic balances.…”
Section: Onera M4 Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of the measured aerodynamic coefficients from the point of symmetry was done for two Mach 0.25 runs of the ONERA M4 model in the modelupright and model-inverted positions [24] [25]. A good repeatability of the results of a model testing at φ = 0° and φ = 180° (Figure 24) is established, the deviations being attributed to the uncertainty of the internal balance used, which, because of the mechanical design of the model, had to be an assembled, Task-type one with accuracy somewhat lower than that of monolithic balances.…”
Section: Onera M4 Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional wind tunnel test include hard supporting fixtures [21,22], including abdominal support, tail support, back support [23], etc. With the development of mechanism technology, parallel support system and rope traction support system have emerged [24][25][26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In experiments, it is necessary to deeply consider tool factors, such as tool holders. Experimental results compared to CFDs will help in getting accurate results [33]. Zhang et al have investigated, numerically, the characteristics between the canard and wing of the canard-forward swept wing aircraft configurations at different canard [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%