Home Visitation Programs 2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-17984-1_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supporting the Paraprofessional Home Visitor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Facilitators were encouraged during their training to be responsive to personal (e.g., psychological, financial) issues that clients may be dealing with during group sessions, which may have led to frequent deviations from the way a session agenda was presented in the instructor manuals. This focus on attending to clients' personal issues is a hallmark of community health workers, particularly paraprofessional home visitors (Korfmacher 2016), who are encouraged to be clientcentered in their approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Facilitators were encouraged during their training to be responsive to personal (e.g., psychological, financial) issues that clients may be dealing with during group sessions, which may have led to frequent deviations from the way a session agenda was presented in the instructor manuals. This focus on attending to clients' personal issues is a hallmark of community health workers, particularly paraprofessional home visitors (Korfmacher 2016), who are encouraged to be clientcentered in their approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the dosage of Child First delivered virtually may not have been sufficient to impact outcomes that may require intensive, in-person clinical services to move. Research done early in the pandemic found that it was challenging for young children to participate in any type of virtual home visiting service (Korfmacher et al, 2021), meaning that children in particular may have experienced little direct intervention via the virtual supports. Nationally, home visitors reported difficulty keeping children engaged and in view during virtual visits, and about 60% of home visitors agreed that they needed to use more strategic coaching of caregiver-child interaction during visits (Korfmacher et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research done early in the pandemic found that it was challenging for young children to participate in any type of virtual home visiting service (Korfmacher et al, 2021), meaning that children in particular may have experienced little direct intervention via the virtual supports. Nationally, home visitors reported difficulty keeping children engaged and in view during virtual visits, and about 60% of home visitors agreed that they needed to use more strategic coaching of caregiver-child interaction during visits (Korfmacher et al, 2021). It is possible that children enrolled in Child First were not as receptive to virtual therapeutic interventions, like CPP, as they would have been if provided via in-person services, and it may have taken time for staff to adapt to this mode of administration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%