Supportive Accountability: A Model for Providing Human Support to Enhance Adherence to eHealth Interventions

Abstract

The effectiveness of and adherence to eHealth interventions is enhanced by human support. However, human support has largely not been manualized and has usually not been guided by clear models. The objective of this paper is to develop a clear theoretical model, based on relevant empirical literature, that can guide research into human support components of eHealth interventions. A review of the literature revealed little relevant information from clinical sciences. Applicable literature was drawn primarily from organizational psychology, motivation theory, and computer-mediated communication (CMC) research. We have developed a model, referred to as “Supportive Accountability.” We argue that human support increases adherence through accountability to a coach who is seen as trustworthy, benevolent, and having expertise. Accountability should involve clear, process-oriented expectations that the patient is involved in determining. Reciprocity in the relationship, through which the patient derives clear benefits, should be explicit. The effect of accountability may be moderated by patient motivation. The more intrinsically motivated patients are, the less support they likely require. The process of support is also mediated by the communications medium (eg, telephone, instant messaging, email). Different communications media each have their own potential benefits and disadvantages. We discuss the specific components of accountability, motivation, and CMC medium in detail. The proposed model is a first step toward understanding how human support enhances adherence to eHealth interventions. Each component of the proposed model is a testable hypothesis. As we develop viable human support models, these should be manualized to facilitate dissemination.

A pilot study of user satisfaction and perceived helpfulness of the Swedish version of the mobile app PTSD Coach

“…One such example would be providing tutorials or examples for how to use the app. Another method to increase usage and adherence to key components could be to combine access to the app with therapist support via e-mail, phone or instant messaging as suggested by the Supportive Accountability model (Mohr, Cuijpers, & Lehman, 2011). …”

Online, social media and mobile technologies for psychosis treatment: A systematic review on novel user-led interventions

“…Patients' involvement should include both generation of ideas and providing feedback on existing designs (Hagen et al, 2012). Finally, the development of future online interventions should follow theory-driven models and testable hypothesis on potential variables influencing engagement and treatment effects (e.g., automated vs. human supported systems, type of human moderation (Mohr et al, 2011), level of intrinsic motivation, insight, cognitive deficits).…”

Understanding and Promoting Effective Engagement With Digital Behavior Change Interventions

“…64 Human facilitation by peer counselors may help as well, creating a supportive community and affirming that the intervention has been found relevant and feasible by others facing similar health problems. However, integrating DBCIs with health care delivered in person can be challenging.…”