2007
DOI: 10.1002/pon.1280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supportive–expressive group therapy for primary breast cancer patients: a randomized prospective multicenter trial

Abstract: This study provides no evidence of reduction in distress as the result of a brief supportive-expressive intervention for women with primary breast cancer. Future studies might productively focus on women with higher initial levels of distress.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
72
1
7

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
72
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The results confirm the effectiveness of CBT group interventions in cancer [22,23,24]. There is mixed support for the effectiveness of supportive-expressive or experiential group therapy in chronic diseases [41,42,43,44,45], but in our study this approach was effective in reducing FoP in cancer patients. During in-patient stay, there was also a reduction in FoP for the control group of cancer patients, which can be understood as part of a general improvement.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The results confirm the effectiveness of CBT group interventions in cancer [22,23,24]. There is mixed support for the effectiveness of supportive-expressive or experiential group therapy in chronic diseases [41,42,43,44,45], but in our study this approach was effective in reducing FoP in cancer patients. During in-patient stay, there was also a reduction in FoP for the control group of cancer patients, which can be understood as part of a general improvement.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…In accordance, the design of clinical trials testing interventions for the reduction of psychological distress in couples facing cancer-in either patients or their partnershas typically been guided by the implicit assumption that, as a population, unselected couples or individuals facing cancer are sufficiently distressed to register a benefit for intervention [4]. However, recruitment of patient samples lacking in sufficient distress to respond positively has beenintervention trials [5,6]. The risk is that psychosocial interventions will be labeled as inefficacious when they would have been shown to be efficacious when administered to a sample with greater distress [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supportive care programs that help patients better understand and cope with their symptoms may result in reduced frequency, duration, and intensity of these physical disease and treatment-related symptoms. Psychological group intervention therapy for cancer patients have been used over the past 20 years (Goodwin et al, 2001;Edwards et al, 2004;Kissane et al, 2007 ;Classen et al, 2008). The aim of these trials is to improve the emotional adjustment of breast cancer patients and prevent the negative psychosocial effects of a cancer diagnosis and treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%