2019
DOI: 10.1080/03004430.2019.1651305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supportive indoor environments for functional play in ECEC institutions: a strategy for promoting well-being and physical activity?

Abstract: The physical environment in Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) institutions provide children with possibilities for play. This study describes a physical environmental intervention aiming to increase the possibilities for functional play in the indoor environment, and its influence on children's well-being and physical activity. The intervention involved the establishment of a tumbling space with soft surfaces, mats and big construction materials. The sample consists of video observations of 65 children… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result corroborates findings in the Danish context [ 23 ], which showed a positive association between MVPA and the indoor area per child. Likewise, recent research has shown that certain modifications in indoor spaces in the ECE context can have an impact on PA [ 32 , 45 ], so larger classrooms and/or lower student/teacher ratios could also increase opportunities for movement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result corroborates findings in the Danish context [ 23 ], which showed a positive association between MVPA and the indoor area per child. Likewise, recent research has shown that certain modifications in indoor spaces in the ECE context can have an impact on PA [ 32 , 45 ], so larger classrooms and/or lower student/teacher ratios could also increase opportunities for movement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Looking at Tables 2 and 3, the analysis shows that there is significantly more R&T play indoors compared to outdoors. There is reason to believe that this is because many of the participating ECEC institutions had available indoor tumble spaces, such as areas with soft surfaces, mats, and large construction materials (Sando and Mehus 2019), and children were allowed by the teachers and practitioners to engage in this kind of play.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the large number of publications in the field of early childhood health education, we were able to include few in the review due to the fact that many of them were cross-sectional studies of children's health knowledge, health status and healthy habits [62][63][64][65][66][67], and also because the majority of recent publications did not focus directly on children, but collected data on children's health behavior based on the perceptions of adults around them (parents, teachers, health professionals) [68][69][70][71][72][73]. Although some studies described interventions in institutional settings for children aged 3-6, they were not pedagogical in nature, but aimed to influence children's health behavior only through infrastructural developments (e.g., adding new play equipment to the playground environment) [74,75]. Thirdly, many studies took a health science approach, often focusing on public health measures (e.g., vaccination) [72,76,77] or on a specific group of diseases [78][79][80] or skills development (motor, cognitive skills) [81][82][83].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%