2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.08.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suppressing Ni–Sn–P growth in SnAgCu/Ni–P solder joints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…5a) were the Sn-rich and Ni 3 P phase, respectively. In contrast, the average composition of the Ni-Sn-P layer (labeled ''c'') was 56.5 at.% Ni, 25.4 at.% Sn, and 18.1 at.% P, which is similar to the composition of the Ni 2 SnP phase reported in the literature [22][23][24][25][26] (Table I). The crystal structure of Ni 2 SnP was orthorhombic (lattice constant: a = 1.28260 nm, b = 0.35943 nm, c = 0.50896 nm; space group: Pnma) 27 and was further verified through TEM electron diffraction analysis.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…5a) were the Sn-rich and Ni 3 P phase, respectively. In contrast, the average composition of the Ni-Sn-P layer (labeled ''c'') was 56.5 at.% Ni, 25.4 at.% Sn, and 18.1 at.% P, which is similar to the composition of the Ni 2 SnP phase reported in the literature [22][23][24][25][26] (Table I). The crystal structure of Ni 2 SnP was orthorhombic (lattice constant: a = 1.28260 nm, b = 0.35943 nm, c = 0.50896 nm; space group: Pnma) 27 and was further verified through TEM electron diffraction analysis.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The crystal structure of Ni 2 SnP was orthorhombic (lattice constant: a = 1.28260 nm, b = 0.35943 nm, c = 0.50896 nm; space group: Pnma) 27 and was further verified through TEM electron diffraction analysis. 23,24,28 Therefore, the results indicated that the small Ni-Sn-P grains on the Ni(P) surface (Fig. 3b) were likely Ni 2 SnP.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because Ni 13 Sn 8 P 3 has a higher Sn content than the Ni-Sn-P deposit, it is speculated that transformation of the Ni-Sn-P deposit into the Ni 13 Sn 8 P 3 compound requires Sn supply from the solder, which is similar to the formation of Ni 2 SnP during the Ni-P/Sn-3.5Ag interfacial reaction. 6,[21][22][23][24] On the basis of these arguments, we believe that polycrystalline Ni 13 Sn 8 P 3 is formed by transformation of amorphous Ni-Sn-P metallization with outward diffusion of Ni and inward diffusion of Sn during the soldering reaction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 It was verified that the spalling phenomena was the result of Ni-Sn-P layer formation between the IMC and the Ni-P metallization. [12][13][14][15][16][17] However, limited data have been reported concerning the formation mechanism of the Ni-Sn-P layer. In this study, the formation of the Ni-Sn-P phase was systematically evaluated, and a description of the corresponding mechanism was proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%