IntroductionAlthough highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has a major beneficial effect on HIV-1-infected individuals, 1,2 it is clear that the next major therapeutic breakthrough requires a better definition of strategies for full immune reconstitution. 3 One of the challenges in achieving this goal is our lack of understanding of the precise spectrum or kinetics of the development of immune dysfunction in individual HIV-infected patients and strategies best suited to reconstitute such immune defects. Although virus-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) clearly play a major role in eliminating virus-infected cells, 4-6 development and maintenance of such CTL pools require CD4 ϩ T helper cell function and an appropriate balance of cytokines. 3,7,8 It is also clear that innate immune mechanisms play a major role particularly during the initial stages of infection, 9,10 influencing the viral load set point, and that virus-neutralizing antibodies contribute to the containment of cell-free virus infection of naive cells. 11,12 Thus, a variety of immune reconstitution strategies need to be explored, some of which may be of benefit to those patients who were initiated on HAART during acute infection, whereas others may be more appropriate to patients with chronic infection. Since the primary target of HIV-1 infection is the CD4 ϩ T cells and the depletion of those cells is one of the major consequences of infection, our laboratory has initially focused on seeking methodologies for the replenishment of this cell lineage.Several studies aimed at immune reconstitution have previously been performed utilizing autologous unfractionated and in vitro expanded CD8 ϩ T cells from HIV-1-infected patients. [13][14][15] Transient decreases in viral load and increases in CD4 ϩ T-cell counts have been achieved utilizing such immune reconstitution therapies. However, these studies used autologous cells collected after HIV infection. Thus, lack of a more profound effect could be due to either an abnormal microenvironment for the adoptively transferred cells to home, survive, and/or execute immune function, or an intrinsic defect in the transferred T cells, as a direct and/or indirect effect of the virus infection. Clearly, a number of defects ranging from loss of lymphocyte specificities and subsets to signaling defects of CD4 ϩ T cells from HIV-1-infected patients have been documented. [16][17][18][19][20] Yet definitive proof for such defects cannot be obtained from the study of humans infected with HIV-1, since it would involve the use of autologous cells obtained prior For personal use only. on May 10, 2018. by guest www.bloodjournal.org From to infection. Hence, such mechanistic questions require the use of an animal model, which provides infection-induced immune dysfunction within an immune system comparable to humans. Simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV)-infected nonhuman primates provide such a model, in which we may attempt to distinguish among the above-mentioned 2 possibilities since the CD4 ϩ T cells can be colle...