2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.2975359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suppression of Cavity Time-Delay Signature Using Noise-Phase-Modulated Feedback

Abstract: We propose reconfiguration of the conventional feedback scheme to suppress the external-cavity time-delay signature (TDS) by adding noise phase modulation in the feedback of semiconductor laser. Noise-phase-modulated feedback introduces broad band noise frequencies into the feedback light and enables the suppression of the TDS. In this work, by means of simulations, the effect on TDS suppression of phase modulation (PM) index is explored. In addition, the influence of noise bandwidth variation is investigated.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The maximum TL obtained in the simulation is approximately 24.6 dB, and most of the transmission loss peaks occur between 15 dB and 25 dB. The main reason for the difference between the measured and simulated TL results is that it is difficult to simulate the acoustic process sufficiently accurately due to the nonlinearity of the materials used in elastic membranes [22].…”
Section: Testing and Verification A Comparison Of Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The maximum TL obtained in the simulation is approximately 24.6 dB, and most of the transmission loss peaks occur between 15 dB and 25 dB. The main reason for the difference between the measured and simulated TL results is that it is difficult to simulate the acoustic process sufficiently accurately due to the nonlinearity of the materials used in elastic membranes [22].…”
Section: Testing and Verification A Comparison Of Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In our scheme of injection into optical time lens with noise phase modulation, it is expectable that the chaotic output signal performs better than that from conventional optical feedback in terms of TDS characteristics because of the stochastic nature of the ASE noise signal [32]. Through numerical investigations, it was noticed that the dispersive fiber coefficients did not play an obvious role according to the variation of the TDS of the chaotic output signal.…”
Section: Time-delay Signature Characteristics Of the Generated Chaosmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, the suppression of phase noise that changes rapidly over time due to rapid changes in the target surface is not satisfactory. The second study is on the suppression of phase noise in the laser itself [30][31][32][33][34], which is also unsatisfactory for photon-level weak target echoes and the lack of prior information on target surface changes. This is because the effect of phase noise on the detected photocurrent data in the conventional LHD method manifests itself as a multiplicative noise.…”
Section: While For the Case Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%