2008
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20079029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suppression of convection around small magnetic concentrations

Abstract: Aims. It is well known that convective motions in the photosphere are suppressed by magnetic fields. However, it has been difficult to study the interaction between convection and small magnetic features, such as G-band bright points (GBPs) or pores with polarimetric measurements, because of the available spatial resolution (∼1 ). This situation is changed by the advent of the SpectroPolarimeter (SP) aboard the Hinode satellite, which has 0. 3 spatial resolution. Methods. We analyzed the pore and its surroundi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
23
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
6
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The downflow channels around the pores and SMCs were well known from previous observations (e.g. Keil et al, 1999;Nagata et al, 2008;Morinaga et al, 2008) and from numerical simulations (Cameron et al, 2007;Spruit, 1979).…”
Section: General Characteristics Of the Pore And Smcmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The downflow channels around the pores and SMCs were well known from previous observations (e.g. Keil et al, 1999;Nagata et al, 2008;Morinaga et al, 2008) and from numerical simulations (Cameron et al, 2007;Spruit, 1979).…”
Section: General Characteristics Of the Pore And Smcmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…For a similar reason, the filling fraction of magnetic field in a single pixel was proposed as an alternative explanation of the difference between pores and SMCs (Knölker and Schüssler, 1988). Morinaga et al (2008) reported that the filling factor of pores (0.8 -0.9) is bigger than that of G-band bright points (0.6). We have estimated the mean filling factor values inside our pores by applying the Milne-Eddington (ME) inversion method (Skumanichi and Lites, 1987) to our SP data.…”
Section: General Characteristics Of the Pore And Smcmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Title et al 1989;Narayan & Scharmer 2010). Morinaga et al (2008) and Kobel et al (2012) concluded that the high spatial density of the kG magnetic fields causes a suppression of the convection process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we bridge the gap between the works of Morinaga et al (2008) and Hagenaar et al (2008) and investigate the spatial relationship between existing strong-field regions and the detection of new magnetic features, which we take as a proxy for dynamo action, at intermediate spatial scales. We focus on the areas around supergranular network flux concentrations, and analyze whether the rate of feature birth at a range of distances from the network concentration (NC) is significantly larger or smaller than would be expected from a random distribution of events.…”
Section: Outlinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the cancellation events have been studied for decades, the suppression of the continued generation of magnetic flux (apart from sunspots) is less extensively studied. Two relatively recent examples include the work of Morinaga et al (2008), in which convection (and thus, presumably, dynamo action) was reduced in the presence of small-scale magnetic features such as G-band bright points, and the work of Hagenaar et al (2008), in which the emergence rate of large-scale ephemeral regions was found to be reduced in areas of strong unipolar magnetic fields (including, but not limited to, coronal holes).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%