2006
DOI: 10.1002/app.23120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suppression of metallocene catalyst leaching by the removal of free trimethylaluminum from methylaluminoxane

Abstract: ABSTRACT:The leaching of the catalyst zirconocene dichloride (Cp 2 ZrCl 2 ) from an SBA-15 silica support during ethylene polymerization was studied; severe leaching was observed when commercial methylaluminoxane (MAO) was used as the cocatalyst. However, the removal of free trimethylaluminum (TMA) from an MAO solution with a sterically hindered phenol reduced the catalyst leaching by 97-100%. The results obtained from the leaching experiments with TMA-free MAO suggested that the major reason for catalyst leac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different zirconocene aluminohydrides supported on silica produced very active systems (50–90 ton PE/molZr‐hr), using MAO as co‐catalyst, however the leaching of the catalysts was very evident because fine particles produced in the reactors caused fouling . According to several reports about studies of leaching in supported metallocenes, the trimethylaluminum (TMA) (always present in commercial MAO solutions) is highly reactive towards the SiO bonds of silica, causing fragmentation of the supported catalyst, and increasing the leaching of the catalysts . On the other hand, the use of silica as support for metallocene catalysts is restricted by several patents, which has motivated searching for alternative methods for using metallocenes and derivatives such as the zirconocene aluminohydrides for application to coordination polymerization in slurry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different zirconocene aluminohydrides supported on silica produced very active systems (50–90 ton PE/molZr‐hr), using MAO as co‐catalyst, however the leaching of the catalysts was very evident because fine particles produced in the reactors caused fouling . According to several reports about studies of leaching in supported metallocenes, the trimethylaluminum (TMA) (always present in commercial MAO solutions) is highly reactive towards the SiO bonds of silica, causing fragmentation of the supported catalyst, and increasing the leaching of the catalysts . On the other hand, the use of silica as support for metallocene catalysts is restricted by several patents, which has motivated searching for alternative methods for using metallocenes and derivatives such as the zirconocene aluminohydrides for application to coordination polymerization in slurry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly to the behavior of the homogeneous polymerizations with the S 1 catalyst, the use of hydrogen in the polymerizations led to higher activities, but in the heterogeneous case several peaks in the kinetic curve are observed (Figure ), suggesting that more than one active species could be present in the polymerization reaction. For supported catalysts the desorption or lixiviation of the metallocene has been widely reported as a drawback, promoting simultaneous polymerization in the supported catalyst (heterogeneous) and in solution (homogeneous). In the kinetic behavior depicted in Figure , the first peak (1000 s) could be attributed to the heterogenized catalyst, which it is then desorbed to the continuous phase, showing another peak at around 3000 s.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[19,20,47] 7) Metallocene complexed with surface-immobilized MAO may degenerate and leach away from the surface to the liquid phase in the silica pores. [8,48,49]…”
Section: Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%