1986
DOI: 10.1677/joe.0.1110001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suppression of ovine plasma FSH by bovine follicular fluid: neutralization by plasma from ewes immunized against an inhibin-enriched preparation from bovine follicular fluid

Abstract: Adult Merino ewes were immunized against an inhibin-enriched preparation (bFFI) obtained by affinity chromatography of bovine follicular fluid (bFF). Plasma was obtained in early luteal phase from these ewes and from control ewes immunized against bovine serum albumin. Ten months after ovariectomy the plasma concentration of FSH, but not LH, in control ewes was decreased by four s.c. injections of 8 ml bFFI (17,500 units inhibin/injection). There was no decrease in plasma concentrations of FSH or LH in immuniz… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been known for many years that injection of oestradiol (Salamonsen et al, 1973;Jonas et al, 1973) or crude preparations of 'inhibin' (e.g. bovine follicular fluid) causes a suppression in the concentration of FSH in sheep (Miller et al, 1982;McNeilly, 1984;Al-Obaidi et al, 1986). However, these studies involved the injection of large amounts of hormone and/or crude preparations of inhibin (usually follicular fluid treated with charcoal to remove steroids) and, so their physiological relevance is uncertain.…”
Section: The Effect Of Oestradiol and Inhibin On Fsh Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been known for many years that injection of oestradiol (Salamonsen et al, 1973;Jonas et al, 1973) or crude preparations of 'inhibin' (e.g. bovine follicular fluid) causes a suppression in the concentration of FSH in sheep (Miller et al, 1982;McNeilly, 1984;Al-Obaidi et al, 1986). However, these studies involved the injection of large amounts of hormone and/or crude preparations of inhibin (usually follicular fluid treated with charcoal to remove steroids) and, so their physiological relevance is uncertain.…”
Section: The Effect Of Oestradiol and Inhibin On Fsh Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, both active (Henderson, Franchimont, Lecomte-Yerna et al 1984;Al-Obaidi, Bindon, Hillard & O'Shea, 1986;Cummins, O'Shea, Al-Obaidi et al 1986;Forage, Brown, Oliver et al 1987;Findlay, Doughton, Robertson & Forage, 1989;Wrathall, McLeod, Glencross et al 1990) and passive (Mann, Campbell, McNeilly & Baird, 1989) immunoneutrali¬ zation of inhibin results in an increase in ovulation rate. In some, but not all, cases, this increase in ovulation rate was related to an increase in the plasma concentration of FSH (see McNeilly et al 1991 for discussion).…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The first efforts to study the effects of active immunization against hormones were done with luteinizing hormone (LH) (Wakabayashi and Tamaoki, 1966;Quadri et al, 1966;Pineda et al, 1968). Subsequently, a vast array of protein-, peptide-and steroid hormones have been tried, including follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) (Torjesen and Sand, 1975;Wickings and Nieschlag, 1980;Al-Obaidi et al, 1986)) human chorionic gonadotrophn (hCG) (Talwar et al, 1976;) thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) (Melmed et al, 1980)) inhibin (Henderson et al, 1984;Scanlon et al, 1993)) growth hormone (GH) (Beattie et al, 1992), luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) (Fraser and Gunn, 1973;Ladd et al, 1990;Adams and Adams, 1992;Thau, 1992;Hoskinson et al, 1990)) vasopressin (Kamoi et al, 1977)) somatostatin (Varner et al, 1980)) testosterone (Thomson et al, 1985;Hillier et al, 1973)) progesterone (Kaushansky et al, 1977) and many others (Ohlson et al, 1981;Yamada et al, 1978;Bettencourt et al, 1993;Ronayne et al, 1990;Skinner et al, 1984;Mettler and Czuppon, 1985;Travis, 1993).…”
Section: Active Immunization Against 'Self'mentioning
confidence: 99%