1999
DOI: 10.1677/joe.0.1600469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suppression of the secretion of luteinizing hormone due to isolation/restraint stress in gonadectomised rams and ewes is influenced by sex steroids

Abstract: In this study we used an isolation/restraint stress to test the hypothesis that stress will affect the secretion of LH differently in gonadectomised rams and ewes treated with different combinations of sex steroids. Romney Marsh sheep were gonadectomised two weeks prior to these experiments. In the first experiment male and female sheep were treated with vehicle or different sex steroids for 7 days prior to the application of the isolation/restraint stress. Male sheep received either i.m. oil (control rams) or… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
66
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
7
66
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, the lack of a sex difference in the suppression of LH during stress suggests that glucocorticoids may not be a major mediator of the stress-induced suppression of LH. This is consistent with the conclusions of Tilbrook et al (1999) and studies conducted in other species (for review see Tilbrook et al 2000).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Consequently, the lack of a sex difference in the suppression of LH during stress suggests that glucocorticoids may not be a major mediator of the stress-induced suppression of LH. This is consistent with the conclusions of Tilbrook et al (1999) and studies conducted in other species (for review see Tilbrook et al 2000).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Alternatively, the detrimental actions of cortisol on the secretion of LH may have been directly attenuated by oestradiol. This latter explanation does not support the finding that in rhesus macaques, 6 h of chair restraint inhibited the secretion of LH during the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle, when oestrogens are elevated, but not during the luteal phase (Norman et al 1994), or the finding, in ovariectomised sheep, that 4 h of isolation/restraint stress inhibited the secretion of LH in the presence and absence of oestradiol (Tilbrook et al 1999). Nevertheless, there might be species differences in the ability of oestrogens to influence the impact of stress on reproduction and/or the discrepancies between the results of these studies might be due to differences in the experimental paradigms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Nevertheless, there might be species differences in the ability of oestrogens to influence the impact of stress on reproduction and/or the discrepancies between the results of these studies might be due to differences in the experimental paradigms. For instance, while stressors were imposed in the studies on rhesus macaques (Norman et al 1994) and sheep (Tilbrook et al 1999), cortisol was injected in the current experiment. The mechanism by which the sustained elevation of cortisol reduced the mean plasma concentrations of LH in the absence of oestradiol is not clear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This absence of a diurnal decrease in circulating cortisol levels suggests at least partial activation of the HPA axis in female marmosets restrained for hypothalamic push-pull perfusion. Adaptation of the monkeys to the restraint (Wade & Ortiz 1997), the amount of movement permitted while in the restraint (Wade & Ortiz 1997), and the close visual proximity of cage mates (Tilbrook et al 1999) may all minimize the elevation of circulating cortisol levels in restrained animals. These restraint-associated elevations in circulating cortisol levels were of a substantially smaller magnitude than those observed in female marmosets following wounding incurred during establishment of intra-sexual social dominance hierarchies over 3 days of new group formation (Saltzman et al 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%