2008
DOI: 10.1099/vir.0.83328-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suppression of tobacco mosaic virus-induced hypersensitive-type necrotization in tobacco at high temperature is associated with downregulation of NADPH oxidase and superoxide and stimulation of dehydroascorbate reductase

Abstract: Tissue necroses and resistance during the hypersensitive response (HR) of tobacco to tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) are overcome at temperatures above 28 6C and the virus multiplies to high levels in the originally resistant N-gene expressing plants. We have demonstrated that chemical compounds that generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) or directly applied hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) are able to induce HR-type necroses in TMV-inoculated Xanthi-nc tobacco even at high temperatures (e.g. 30 6C). The amount of supe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
60
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
4
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This reveals a hierarchical response to stress where the HS response has priority over a pathogen response (Schweizer et al 1995). Resistance to HRtype necrosis was overcome in TMV-infected tobacco kept at high temperature (30°C), as seen by decreased ROS, SA, and PR proteins, leading to eventual virus replication and spread (Király et al 2008). This highlights the importance of recovery after HS, prior to pathogen exposure, allowing chaperone production without jeopardizing defense protein production.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This reveals a hierarchical response to stress where the HS response has priority over a pathogen response (Schweizer et al 1995). Resistance to HRtype necrosis was overcome in TMV-infected tobacco kept at high temperature (30°C), as seen by decreased ROS, SA, and PR proteins, leading to eventual virus replication and spread (Király et al 2008). This highlights the importance of recovery after HS, prior to pathogen exposure, allowing chaperone production without jeopardizing defense protein production.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…ETI is often accompanied by accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), triggering the hypersensitive response (HR). HR is a rapid form of programed cell death (PCD) associated with plant defense (Espinosa and Alfano 2004) and characterized, morphologically, by the formation of localized necrotic lesions around the site of pathogen entry (Király et al 2008). HR isolates the pathogen, preventing dissemination and further damage while limiting pathogen access to water and nutrients (Coll et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, we analyzed the profile of the expression of NtrbohD, a NADPH oxidase gene that may be involved in ROS production during TMV-induced HR (Király et al 2008). Although the gene expression of NtrbohD in BBF1-overexperssing and control leaves increased after agrobacterium infiltration, there were no significant differences in mRNA levels between the two leaves.…”
Section: Transient Overexpression Of Bbf1 Enhances Ros Production Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Production of ROS is associated with N-mediated HR upon TMV infection or p50 expression in tobacco (Allan et al 2001;Király et al 2008;Ogata et al 2012). We examined the effect of BBF1 overexpression on ROS production in both Samsun nn and Samsun NN tobacco.…”
Section: Transient Overexpression Of Bbf1 Enhances Ros Production Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Symptoms of virus infection in pepper plants usually develops within 1-3 weeks of infection (Anandakumar et al, 2008). When plants are attacked by pathogens they respond by activating a variety of defense mechanisms, including the rapid production and accumulation of ROS (reacting oxygen species) (Kiraly et al, 2008). On the other hand, the phenolic content of the plants increases as a response of the defense mechanism (Katoh et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%