2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2010.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suppression of very low intensity precipitation in Korea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At MP, the snow N(D) was similar between Mtype and C-type around 0.6 to 1 mm diameter but the N(D) of M-type was higher than that of C-type at the larger diameter range. These results suggest that DG is mainly affected by the orographic effect around 0.6 to 1 mm diameter while the effect was weak for the same diameters at MP (Yum and Cha 2010;Cha et al 2009). However, the difference of snow N(D) between M-type and C-type at MP was larger than that at DG for the 5-10 mm diameter range.…”
Section: Temperature Wind Speed and Wind Direction Effects On Dsdmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At MP, the snow N(D) was similar between Mtype and C-type around 0.6 to 1 mm diameter but the N(D) of M-type was higher than that of C-type at the larger diameter range. These results suggest that DG is mainly affected by the orographic effect around 0.6 to 1 mm diameter while the effect was weak for the same diameters at MP (Yum and Cha 2010;Cha et al 2009). However, the difference of snow N(D) between M-type and C-type at MP was larger than that at DG for the 5-10 mm diameter range.…”
Section: Temperature Wind Speed and Wind Direction Effects On Dsdmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The 'snow' occurrence frequency was higher at DG with 21% than at MP with 12% because DG is at northern latitude and higher altitude than MP. These results indicate that the mountainous site (DG) is affected by the orographic effect that can more easily induce precipitation (Blanchard 1953;Yum and Cha 2010). Supportively, Sun-Hee et al 2012showed precipitation enhancement in the DG site area by the orographic effect using numerical modeling.…”
Section: Analysis Of Hc Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Yum and Cha [] proposed a parameter called the precipitation efficiency of orographic clouds for better accounting for the suppression of light rain by air pollution. It is defined as the frequency of precipitation (Fp) divided by the frequency of orographic clouds (Fc).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is useful to study trends in different rain intensities, in addition to total rainfall, given their different roles in the hydrological cycle and in extreme events such as floods and droughts [ Goswami et al , ]. Similar to Yum and Cha [], rain intensity is classified into four categories: very low (VL; ≤ 0.6 mm h −1 ), low (LO; 0.6–2 mm h −1 ), moderate (MO; 2–8 mm h −1 ), and high (HI; > 8 mm h −1 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Globally, there is a partial agreement between the disdrometer and the rain masking algorithm: After 1815 UTC rain intensity drops so much that the disdrometer is unable to detect the precipitation, while after 2200 UTC, the rain masking algorithm fails to detect the rainfall up to the ground. Precipitation events from lidar data are then necessary to fill a gap in detecting very low precipitation intensity events (<0.05 mm h −1 ) that are crucial to study the aerosol effects and interactions on clouds and rainfall [33].…”
Section: A Simple Case: 22 April 2016mentioning
confidence: 99%