43rd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference &Amp;amp; Exhibit 2007
DOI: 10.2514/6.2007-5538
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suppresson of Cavitation Surge in a Turbopump Inducer by the Backflow Restriction Step

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The so-called backflow vortex cavitation, which is a rotating instability with multiple cells formed in backflow vortices, was detected for the first time in 1997 [19] for two separated ranges of values of the cavitation number: at high cavitation numbers (three to four times the breakdown cavitation number), when the tip vortex cavitation is the principal form of cavitation, and around the head breakdown for low flow coefficient, where the backflow is particularly strong. It has been recently shown in the open literature that the extent of the cavitation backflow and, consequently, of the surge instability associated to it can be significantly reduced by adding a backflow restriction step to the inducer casing [20].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The so-called backflow vortex cavitation, which is a rotating instability with multiple cells formed in backflow vortices, was detected for the first time in 1997 [19] for two separated ranges of values of the cavitation number: at high cavitation numbers (three to four times the breakdown cavitation number), when the tip vortex cavitation is the principal form of cavitation, and around the head breakdown for low flow coefficient, where the backflow is particularly strong. It has been recently shown in the open literature that the extent of the cavitation backflow and, consequently, of the surge instability associated to it can be significantly reduced by adding a backflow restriction step to the inducer casing [20].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the future, combinations with backflow reversal [4], which is effective in controlling backflow in low flow conditions, should be considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As methods to suppress cavitation instability, J-Groove [3] and the Backflow Restriction Step [4] have been studied, but while they are effective for certain instability phenomena, they have not been able to prevent them completely. In addition, issues remain from the viewpoints of simplicity of processing and miniaturization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of easy implementation of this method, it seems to be a common one in modern rocket engine turbopumps. To enlarge the range of operation flow rate of inducer, various kinds of casing treatments such as J-Groove [14], circumferential groove [15] and backflow restriction step [16] have been proposed and have contributed to extend our 5 FE- Watanabe knowledge in terms of the suppression of cavitation instabilities. However, the effectiveness of them were examined in the limited range of the flow rate, from slightly partial flow rate to the design or over flow rate, and some of them seem to be not effective at extremely low flow rates, at which a large flow recirculation due to strong inlet backflow from inducer occurs in nature [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%