2013
DOI: 10.1155/2013/658989
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supraclavicular Artery Flap for Head and Neck Oncologic Reconstruction: An Emerging Alternative

Abstract: Aim. Head and Neck oncologic resections often leave complex defects which are challenging to reconstruct. The need of the hour is a versatile flap which has the advantages of both a regional flap (viz. reliable and easy to harvest) and a free flap (thin, pliable with good colour match). In this a study we assessed the usefulness of the supraclavicular artery flap in head and neck oncologic defects. Materials and Method. The flap was used as a pedicled fasciocutanous and was based on the transverse supraclavicu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
32
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The supraclavicular artery flap provides large thin fascio-cutaneous coverage to most of the defects of the head and neck region [ 49 ]. This flap is easy to harvest and a good colour match if used for skin defects [ 50 ]. Super-charge of flap can be done if a large size flap is needed [ 51 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The supraclavicular artery flap provides large thin fascio-cutaneous coverage to most of the defects of the head and neck region [ 49 ]. This flap is easy to harvest and a good colour match if used for skin defects [ 50 ]. Super-charge of flap can be done if a large size flap is needed [ 51 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 Although unilateral SCAIF has already been used in repair of similar defects of smaller dimensions, here we discuss the case where SCAIF is being used for closure of a circumferential pharyngeal defect after resection of the long stricture segment. 17,18 SCAIF is easily accessible, can be harvested quickly thereby decreasing the operating time significantly. The thin pedicle allows tunneling of the island flap into the defect with considerable ease in the head and neck region and offers a loco regional flap…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Single‐institution studies have described reconstruction of oral (i.e., tongue, lip, buccal, palatal, mandibular), facial (i.e., nasal, periorbital, orbital, auriculotemporal), laryngeal, pharyngeal, esophageal, tracheal, posterolateral skull base, neck, and chest wall defects using the SCF . Various authors champion differences in preoperative Doppler use, harvest location, pedicle skeletonization, and suitable defect sites for reconstruction . These SCF practice patterns have yet to be characterized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6][7] Various authors champion differences in preoperative Doppler use, harvest location, pedicle skeletonization, and suitable defect sites for reconstruction. 3,4,[8][9][10][11][12] These SCF practice patterns have yet to be characterized. Furthermore, SCF outcomes have varied substantially by study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%