2003
DOI: 10.2172/813606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supramolecular Structures for Photochemical Energy Conversion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, molecular systems in which the electron donor and electron acceptor are covalently connected have been investigated. The intramolecular through-bond charge separation process usually takes place via the excited singlet states of the sensitizing electron donor dye and/or electron acceptor dye. In general, intramolecular charge separation rates are quite faster than the intermolecular electron transfer rates via the excited triplet state. , However, the lifetimes of the charge separation states of such dyads are not long enough to mediate the electron and/or hole of the charge separation state to electron carriers and to catalysts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, molecular systems in which the electron donor and electron acceptor are covalently connected have been investigated. The intramolecular through-bond charge separation process usually takes place via the excited singlet states of the sensitizing electron donor dye and/or electron acceptor dye. In general, intramolecular charge separation rates are quite faster than the intermolecular electron transfer rates via the excited triplet state. , However, the lifetimes of the charge separation states of such dyads are not long enough to mediate the electron and/or hole of the charge separation state to electron carriers and to catalysts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on thermodynamic criteria, a comparison of the energies of paths a, b, and c in Scheme 5 immediately excludes the HT path, because it is 16.5 kcal mol À1 uphill. At first, one may guess that the H À T (path b:À26.1 kcal mol À1 ) must be a favorable process because of the exothermicity of the overall H À T. However, many previous studies indicated that this is most likely not the case especially when competing with an ET (path c: 6.8 kcal mol À1 ) in the reaction system, due to the extremely higher intrinsic barrier for H À T (Brinkley and Roth, 2005;Eberson, 1982;Gust et al, 1993;Li and Zhu, 2018). The energy requirement for ET to occur in N-Ph-THIQ oxidation by DDQ (DG ET = 6.8 kcal mol À1 ) can be well filled up by the highly exothermic follow-up hydrogen release from its radical cation (step d, DH HT = À31.8 kcal mol À1 ).…”
Section: Oxidation By Hydride Acceptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When a hydride acceptor serves as the oxidant, it was found that cleavage of the amine a-C-H bond could possibly be initiated either by hydride, hydrogen, or by electron transfer. Among them, the intrinsic barrier of electron transfer is known to be much lower than those of atom/group transfers (Brinkley et al, 2005;Fukuzumi, 2003;Gust et al, 1993;Li and Zhu, 2018). Therefore, even an uphill ET can be expected to occur if the energetic barrier is not much greater than 0.5 eV (1 eV = 23.1 kcal mol À1 ), because the deficiency of driving forces could be easily compensated by exothermic follow-up processes (Cheng et al, 1998;Eberson, 1982).…”
Section: Oxidation By Hydride Acceptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%