1996
DOI: 10.1007/s002619900017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suprapubic versus transrectal ultrasonography in assessing the volume of the prostate and the transition zone in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia

Abstract: The reliability of suprapubic ultrasonography (SU) in assessing the size of the prostate was examined in 95 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Volumetric measurements of the prostate and the transition zone of the prostate (TZP) performed by SU were compared with corresponding measurements obtained by transrectal ultrasonography measurements obtained by transrectal ultrasonography (TU). A very strong correlation was found between suprapubically and transrectally performed measurements for both t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Justification for the use of ultrasound in determination of prostate volume was based on findings that have proven that there was no statistical difference in prostate volume measured by transrectal ultrasound compared to abdominopelvic ultrasound [ 13 – 16 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Justification for the use of ultrasound in determination of prostate volume was based on findings that have proven that there was no statistical difference in prostate volume measured by transrectal ultrasound compared to abdominopelvic ultrasound [ 13 – 16 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially, estimation of prostate volume was done by transabdominal ultrasound but this has transitioned to the use of transrectal ultrasound. With respect to prostate volume estimation there is no significant difference between measured prostate volumes;[ 7 ] if the comfort of the patient is being considered, suprapubic ultrasound has an advantage over transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) since it is better tolerated. [ 8 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lavage following drainage allows for antibiotics to be introduced directly into the post-drainage cavity ( 26 ). TRUS is usually safe to perform except in a few cases where TRUS is contraindicated such as in patients with severe haemorrhoids, anal fistulas, fissures or after abdominoperineal resection ( 27 ).…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%