2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11406-008-9145-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supreme Emergencies Without the Bad Guys

Abstract: This paper discusses the application of the supreme emergency doctrine from just-war theory to non-antagonistic threats. Two versions of the doctrine are considered: Michael Walzer's communitarian version and Brian Orend's prudential one. I investigate first whether the doctrines are applicable to non-antagonistic threats, and second whether they are defensible. I argue that a version of Walzer's doctrine seems to be applicable to non-antagonistic threats, but that it is very doubtful whether the doctrine is d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A normative perspective refers to what kind of moral framework/approach is to be utilized as a reference point in considering a situation a public emergency. Notably, while the notion of supreme emergency, for instance, is heavily used in the discussions on just war and justifiable conducts in war, the idea of emergency as such is largely confined to overwhelmingly horrifying situations and matters of collective survival (Sandin 2009). On the other hand, while public health ethics literature accommodates a great deal of ethical debate on public emergency preparedness, resource allocation and rationing, in addition to offering practical guidelines on viability and transparency of the measures, a more general reference point to discuss what constitutes an emergency from a normative point of view is still open to exploration (Jennings and others 2016;Wynia 2007).…”
Section: Taking Health Worker Emigration From Under-served Countries mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A normative perspective refers to what kind of moral framework/approach is to be utilized as a reference point in considering a situation a public emergency. Notably, while the notion of supreme emergency, for instance, is heavily used in the discussions on just war and justifiable conducts in war, the idea of emergency as such is largely confined to overwhelmingly horrifying situations and matters of collective survival (Sandin 2009). On the other hand, while public health ethics literature accommodates a great deal of ethical debate on public emergency preparedness, resource allocation and rationing, in addition to offering practical guidelines on viability and transparency of the measures, a more general reference point to discuss what constitutes an emergency from a normative point of view is still open to exploration (Jennings and others 2016;Wynia 2007).…”
Section: Taking Health Worker Emigration From Under-served Countries mentioning
confidence: 99%