1974
DOI: 10.5802/aif.495
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sur le théorème de Poincaré-Bendixson

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
3

Year Published

1975
1975
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
14
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Remark. -(6.2) is an improvement over the corresponding results in [3] and [6] in that it is not necessary to assume that the individual leaves of ^ are immersed submanifolds of class C 3 . 1) The orbits of 0^.…”
Section: Codimension One Foliationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Remark. -(6.2) is an improvement over the corresponding results in [3] and [6] in that it is not necessary to assume that the individual leaves of ^ are immersed submanifolds of class C 3 . 1) The orbits of 0^.…”
Section: Codimension One Foliationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [7,8] Sacksteder proved a generalization of Denjoy's result which has been extensively exploited by authors studying codimension one foliations. For example, in [3] and [6] it is shown that C 2 codimension one foliations whose leaves have non exponential growth cannot have exceptional minimal sets. The proof uses Sacksteder's theorem as well as the generalization for codimension one foliations of the Poincare-Bendixson theorem.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La signification géométrique de ces classes secondaires et, en particulier, de l'invariant de Godbillon-Vey, reste cependant assez peu claire. R. Moussu et F. Pelletier d'une part [20], et D. Sullivan d'autre part [23], suggèrent alors que cet invariant pourrait être de nature dynamique et, dans cet esprit, conjecturent qu'un feuilletage à croissance sous-exponentielle (i.e. « dynamiquement simple ») a un invariant de Gôdbillon-Vey trivial.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Notable advances included Hector's work on classification and examples, starting with his Thesis and subsequent developments of its themes [132,133,135,138]; Lamoureux's work on holonomy and "captured leaves" [200,201,202,203]; Moussu's study of foliations almost without holonomy [239,240]; Nishimori's study of the asymptotic properties and growth of leaves in foliations [245,246,247,248]; and Plante's study of the relation between growth of leaves and the fundamental groups of the ambient manifolds.…”
Section: Foliation Dynamics In Codimension Onementioning
confidence: 99%