1931
DOI: 10.1080/00378941.1931.10832895
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sur quelques espèces de Bromes et leurs hybrides. 1. Révision duBromus maximusDesf. d'après l'étude des peuplements naturels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

1933
1933
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result would suggest that the octoploid derived from hybridization between the hexaploid B. rigidus (as maternal genome donor) and the diploid B. sterilis , which agrees with the early hypotheses from morphology, experimental crosses ( Cugnac and Camus, 1931 ) and isozyme data ( Oja and Jaaska, 1996 ;Oja and Laarman, 2002 ). This result would suggest that the octoploid derived from hybridization between the hexaploid B. rigidus (as maternal genome donor) and the diploid B. sterilis , which agrees with the early hypotheses from morphology, experimental crosses ( Cugnac and Camus, 1931 ) and isozyme data ( Oja and Jaaska, 1996 ;Oja and Laarman, 2002 ).…”
Section: Comparison Of Data Sets and Monophyly Of Section Genea -supporting
confidence: 86%
“…This result would suggest that the octoploid derived from hybridization between the hexaploid B. rigidus (as maternal genome donor) and the diploid B. sterilis , which agrees with the early hypotheses from morphology, experimental crosses ( Cugnac and Camus, 1931 ) and isozyme data ( Oja and Jaaska, 1996 ;Oja and Laarman, 2002 ). This result would suggest that the octoploid derived from hybridization between the hexaploid B. rigidus (as maternal genome donor) and the diploid B. sterilis , which agrees with the early hypotheses from morphology, experimental crosses ( Cugnac and Camus, 1931 ) and isozyme data ( Oja and Jaaska, 1996 ;Oja and Laarman, 2002 ).…”
Section: Comparison Of Data Sets and Monophyly Of Section Genea -supporting
confidence: 86%