1987
DOI: 10.5650/jos1956.36.847
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface-Active Properties of Succinoyl Trehalose Lipids as Microbial Biosurfactants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many types of sugar-based surfactants like sucrose or sorbitan esters are widely used as emulsifiers, dispersants, or solubilizers 13) . To our best knowledge, STL-1 shows the lowest g CMC among the sugar-based surfac- 7) . Based on their analyses, the sodium salt possessed 1.42 succinoyl and 1.5 tetradecyl residues in the trehalose moiety.…”
Section: Fig 1 Tlc Patterns Of Glycolipids Produced Bymentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Many types of sugar-based surfactants like sucrose or sorbitan esters are widely used as emulsifiers, dispersants, or solubilizers 13) . To our best knowledge, STL-1 shows the lowest g CMC among the sugar-based surfac- 7) . Based on their analyses, the sodium salt possessed 1.42 succinoyl and 1.5 tetradecyl residues in the trehalose moiety.…”
Section: Fig 1 Tlc Patterns Of Glycolipids Produced Bymentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Polysialogangliosides, lysoganglioside, and GM3 are reported to decrease PKC activity of HL60, brain, and A431, respectively (28). The critical micelle concentration of STL and MEL are 960 and 2.7 µM, respectively (17,18). As the effective concentration of STL (5 µM) is far less than the critical micelle concentration, while that of MEL (10 µM) is above CMC, MEL is assumed to form micelles, which could interact more on the cell membrane than STL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was apparent that the ester molecule itself was responsible for the activity, since neither sugar moieties nor fatty acids of STL and MEL in the free form proved to be effective in inducing differentiation of cells. On the other hand, it is reported that STL and MEL can act as anionic surfactant and nonionic surfactant with detergent properties, respectively (18,19). To confirm whether or not the ability of inducing differentiation of HL60 cells could be attributed to surface activities of these biosurfactants, we used analogues of STL and MEL.…”
Section: Effect Of Stl and Mel On Hl60 Cell Growth And Cell Differentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biosurfactants show excellent surface activities despite their bulky molecular structures in comparison with conventional synthetic surfactants (1)(2)(3)(4). Therefore, studies of biosurfactants have been primarily conducted for the purpose of developing new functions as fine chemicals (5,6).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%