2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.08.132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface adhesion between ceramic injection molding feedstocks and processing tools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(20 reference statements)
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The measurement of the rheological behavior in smooth dies results in greater underestimated viscosity, however, as shown in the studies [13,14], due to lower shear rate gradients, slipping at the wall might positively affect the tendency of PIM feedstocks towards powder and binder separation. Figure 9 demonstrates that the values of slip velocities obtained for Al 2 O 3 powder in the smooth slit die are comparable with the slip velocities of ZrO 2 feedstock in the roughened slit die; the tendency of Al 2 O 3 feedstock to wall slip as a function of the die geometry and surface roughness is generally less pronounced than for ZrO 2 compound, although as we showed recently [31], their surface characteristics (surface energies) were fairly similar—44 and 47 J/m 2 for ZrO 2 and Al 2 O 3 , respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The measurement of the rheological behavior in smooth dies results in greater underestimated viscosity, however, as shown in the studies [13,14], due to lower shear rate gradients, slipping at the wall might positively affect the tendency of PIM feedstocks towards powder and binder separation. Figure 9 demonstrates that the values of slip velocities obtained for Al 2 O 3 powder in the smooth slit die are comparable with the slip velocities of ZrO 2 feedstock in the roughened slit die; the tendency of Al 2 O 3 feedstock to wall slip as a function of the die geometry and surface roughness is generally less pronounced than for ZrO 2 compound, although as we showed recently [31], their surface characteristics (surface energies) were fairly similar—44 and 47 J/m 2 for ZrO 2 and Al 2 O 3 , respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Functional prototype parts and tooling are manufactured directly from computer models [ 8 ]. CIM technology usually uses a binder system based on polyolefins and the waxes low density polyethylene (LDPE), poly(ethylene glycol) 6000 (PEG6000), paraffin wax (PW), carnauba wax (CW), Acrawax (AW), and stearic acid (SA), and the loading of the binder system varies from 14.5 to 15.8 wt% [ 9 , 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primary (backbone) binders for highly filled metal and ceramic powder feedstocks are mostly based on polyolefins (low-and high-density polyethylenes and polypropylene) [4][5][6]. For ceramic powders, water-soluble binders based on polyethylene glycol (PEG) steadily gain attention [7][8][9][10]. Lower molecular weight of PEG is usually recommended for PIM applications [11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, we showed that semicrystalline waxes such as carnauba wax (CW) and acrawax (AW) have a promising potential as binders for high powder loadings [7,9], and they could substitute the role of polyolefin backbone in PIM binder compositions [10]. According to the FTIR, calorimetry and contact angles analyses [7,15], AW have high values of polar component of surface energy and proved to have twice as strong interactions to PEG than CW. On the other hand, based on the contact angles analysis [7], CW may overtake the role of SA as a surfactant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation