2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00703-012-0206-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface air temperature in the Canadian Arctic: scaling and pattern change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
4
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences in exponent values compared to SUTEANU and MANDEA (2012), however, seem to be mainly explained by the selection of the scaling interval for the determination of the exponent. In most cases, minimum temperature time series have higher persistence than maximum temperature, in agreement with other studies (KIRALY et al 2006;SUTEANU 2011;SUTEANU and MANDEA 2012).…”
Section: Results Concerning Scaling Aspectssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Differences in exponent values compared to SUTEANU and MANDEA (2012), however, seem to be mainly explained by the selection of the scaling interval for the determination of the exponent. In most cases, minimum temperature time series have higher persistence than maximum temperature, in agreement with other studies (KIRALY et al 2006;SUTEANU 2011;SUTEANU and MANDEA 2012).…”
Section: Results Concerning Scaling Aspectssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…To this end we applied the same methodology to running windows. The window length proved not to have a substantial impact on the outcome of this analysis, as was also the case in WALSH et al (2005) andMANDEA (2012). Results for 7-year long windows shifted by one year are presented here.…”
Section: Results Concerning Scaling Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…On the other hand, all other analyses, irrespective of scale, indicate fBm, with the exception of the intraday scales portion of the DFA, which indicates persistent fBm.with α > 1.5 (the value for Brownian motion) The SA yields α ≈ 1.4 for all scales; DFA for day-month scales yields α = 1.38 but for intraday scales α = 1.63. The overall result is not surprising, however, because although a number of similar analyses hitherto have found persistent fGn with H between~0.6 and~0.8 [Bunde and Havlin, 2002;Királi and Jánosi, 2005;Suteanu and Mandea, 2012;Varotsos et al, 2013], these analyses used long time series at coarser temporal resolution to investigate, e.g., the presence of long-term memory. Strangely, classification as fGn or fBm, persistent or antipersistent does not seem to be the norm, so the figures in the aforementioned references must be examined individually, this being the basis for positioning of the annotation in Figure 7.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…When sunlight is present, the maximum temperature occurs around ~12 to ~15 UT (i.e., approximately 14 local time). It is not, however, a goal here to study surface air temperature variation per se (e.g., see the modern approach of Suteanu and Mandea [] and references therein), but rather to compare these local intraday values to the corresponding tropopause response as was done for intra‐annual timescales by Hall et al . [] previously.…”
Section: Results: Surface Air Temperaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%