Springer Handbook of Materials Measurement Methods 2006
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-30300-8_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface and Interface Characterization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 138 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We now see that there is a more effective way of describing the M 2 dependence. Elsewhere, 45 in analysing the effects for Ne and Xe primary ions, we have similar plots where, in each case, the values of the sputtering yield rise as a function of M 2 to a constant plateau value for M 2 > 100. Superimposed on this rise at low M 2 is a broad peak whose intensity and position depend on M 1 .…”
Section: Unique Constants For Each Target Atom In This Adaptation Of mentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We now see that there is a more effective way of describing the M 2 dependence. Elsewhere, 45 in analysing the effects for Ne and Xe primary ions, we have similar plots where, in each case, the values of the sputtering yield rise as a function of M 2 to a constant plateau value for M 2 > 100. Superimposed on this rise at low M 2 is a broad peak whose intensity and position depend on M 1 .…”
Section: Unique Constants For Each Target Atom In This Adaptation Of mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…As noted later, the Q values depend on M 1 and so, for general use for other incident ions, these Q eff values may then need to be studied further. 45 In Fig. 1 we add a curve for the expression used by Steinbruchel 9 for comparison.…”
Section: Fitting To Published Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…54 Note that the scattering intensities of each peak are related to incident laser intensity, molecular vibration frequencies, and the change in molecular polarizability and is not indicative of film thickness or amount while peak broadening arises from anharmonicities such as chemical (elemental) and physical (crystallinity) inhomogeneity. 56 There were no magnesium carbonate related samples in the RRUFF database which possessed a peak at 1075 cm −1 but carbonate peaks are known to occur in the range of wavenumbers with magnesite, MgCO 3 , possessing a peak at 1095 cm −1 . The peak observed at 982 cm −1 is indicative of an SO 4 2− containing species which most closely resembles the standard spectrum of epsomite (MgSO 4 · 7H 2 O).…”
Section: Potentiostatic Polarization Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the purposes of energy calibration, a PES spectrum of the Au 4f electrons was recorded immediately after each C 1s and S 2p measurement on the same region of the sample surface. The Au 4f 7/2 photoelectron at 84.0 eV 42,43 was then used to convert from kinetic energy to binding energy scales. Furthermore, the C 1s and S 2p spectra from freshly prepared dodecane thiolate monolayers on Au were recorded periodically to serve as absolute calibration standards.…”
Section: Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%