2020
DOI: 10.1177/1081286520965646
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface and interfacial anti-plane waves in micropolar solids with surface energy

Abstract: In this work, the propagation behaviour of a surface wave in a micropolar elastic half-space with surface strain and kinetic energies localized at the surface and the propagation behaviour of an interfacial anti-plane wave between two micropolar elastic half-spaces with interfacial strain and kinetic energies localized at the interface have been studied. The Gurtin–Murdoch model has been adopted for surface and interfacial elasticity. Dispersion equations for both models have been obtained in algebraic form fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth mentioning that the above contact laws establish a generalization to the case of strain gradient elasticity of the so-called coherent or Gurtin-Murdoch's interface model, according to which the traction vector suffers a jump discontinuity, satisfying a two-dimensional Laplace-Young equation. This particular model has been first developed for continuum theories with surface effects by the early work of Gurtin & Murdoch [52] and applied to surface and interfacial wave propagation by [53][54][55]. Indeed, the term ℎL αβ u , αβ 0 represents the divergence of a surface stress tensor defined on the plane of the interface, equivalent to the one introduced in [52].…”
Section: (E) the Interface Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth mentioning that the above contact laws establish a generalization to the case of strain gradient elasticity of the so-called coherent or Gurtin-Murdoch's interface model, according to which the traction vector suffers a jump discontinuity, satisfying a two-dimensional Laplace-Young equation. This particular model has been first developed for continuum theories with surface effects by the early work of Gurtin & Murdoch [52] and applied to surface and interfacial wave propagation by [53][54][55]. Indeed, the term ℎL αβ u , αβ 0 represents the divergence of a surface stress tensor defined on the plane of the interface, equivalent to the one introduced in [52].…”
Section: (E) the Interface Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A n e β n kx 2 e i(kx 1 −ωt) , ψ = Be kx 2 e i(kx 1 −ωt) , φ = e −kx 2 e i(kx 1 −ωt) , (30) where β n > 0 are the attenuation coefficients.…”
Section: Bleustein-gulyaev Wavementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Substituting solution (30) into boundary conditions ( 28) and ( 29), one will obtain the following system:…”
Section: Fundingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, one can transform δE and δA using Eulerian coordinates. Changing coordinates X → x in (49) and using (19) and (21), one has…”
Section: Lagrange Variational Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The boundary conditions of the normal gradient of mass density are introduced first on logical grounds and only subsequently they are physically interpreted. More recent discussion of novel boundary conditions that can be introduced in second continuum theories can be found in [21,[41][42][43]47,50,109]. In particular, the interrelations between Toupin-Mindlin strain gradient elasticity with the surface elasticity by Gurtin-Murdoch were analysed in [50], whereas similar comparison of surface phenomena within the lattice dynamics was provided in [51,117].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%