2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.06.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface and mechanical properties of graphene–clay/polyimide composites and thin films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The AFM images show that the surface of the neat CMC film is quite smooth with an average surface roughness of 16 nm, whereas the images of CMC@GOn show that the average roughness of nanocomposite films gradually increases with the increasing of GOn loadings, showing a maximum of 59 nm for high GOn loading (7 wt %). This behavior was also previously observed for polymer nanocomposite films based on graphene and clay . The relatively low values of average roughness observed for CMC@GOn films may be due to the good homogenous dispersion of nanosheets within the CMC matrix; additionally, no large aggregates were formed in resulting films.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The AFM images show that the surface of the neat CMC film is quite smooth with an average surface roughness of 16 nm, whereas the images of CMC@GOn show that the average roughness of nanocomposite films gradually increases with the increasing of GOn loadings, showing a maximum of 59 nm for high GOn loading (7 wt %). This behavior was also previously observed for polymer nanocomposite films based on graphene and clay . The relatively low values of average roughness observed for CMC@GOn films may be due to the good homogenous dispersion of nanosheets within the CMC matrix; additionally, no large aggregates were formed in resulting films.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The falloff is usually attributed to nanosheet aggregation and has been observed before for both BN and graphene based composites. 7,27,37,45,46 We find that the maximum modulus observed in all cases was just over 1.5 GPa (figure 4A), only slightly above the value of 1.45 GPa for the asprepared polymer. We also measured the rate of increase of modulus, dY/dVf, as shown in figure 4B.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The glass transition temperature ( T g ) is defined as the peak temperature of tan δ‐T curve. The tan δ peak height reduces greatly with the increase of HSE content, which is due to increasing restriction to chain mobility and energy dissipation with increasing chain entanglement .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%