1995
DOI: 10.1080/00103629509369513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface application of liquid swine manure: Chemical variability

Abstract: The determination of manure loading rates for crop production is complicated by the temporal variability in manure nutrient concentrations and the difficulty in obtaining representative samples on which to base application rates. The variation in nutrient concentrations in liquid swine manure obtained from an agitated anaerobic lagoon was examined during application to experimental plots. Grab samples were collected from a lagoon approximately two to four weeks prior to application and analyzed for nitrogen (N… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fresh swine waste contains approximately 10% solids, while deep pit and lagoon effluents are 4 to 8% solids and <0.5 to 1%, respectively (Fulhage and Post, 2005). O'Dell et al (1995) found the solids content ranged from 4 to 10 g/L in 18 separate tank loads of swine effluent that had been agitated for 24 h before application, suggesting effluent application rates can be highly variable. The practice of stockpiling fresh manure and applying directly to fields is also used in the beef cattle industry, however, little is known about the effects on the nutrient properties (Dolliver and Gupta, 2008; Larney et al, 2006).…”
Section: Management Of Animal Waste From Production Agriculturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fresh swine waste contains approximately 10% solids, while deep pit and lagoon effluents are 4 to 8% solids and <0.5 to 1%, respectively (Fulhage and Post, 2005). O'Dell et al (1995) found the solids content ranged from 4 to 10 g/L in 18 separate tank loads of swine effluent that had been agitated for 24 h before application, suggesting effluent application rates can be highly variable. The practice of stockpiling fresh manure and applying directly to fields is also used in the beef cattle industry, however, little is known about the effects on the nutrient properties (Dolliver and Gupta, 2008; Larney et al, 2006).…”
Section: Management Of Animal Waste From Production Agriculturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is not toxic and does not cause eutrophication in aquatic systems. The plant requirement for N is the primary consideration for land application of livestock manure (Gburek et al 2000), and P has recently become a consideration, especially for manures rich in P (O'Dell et al 1995). When only two elements are the primary consideration for manure application, it is quite possible that insufficient supply of some elements or accumulation of certain other elements in soils will occur, resulting in unbalanced utilization of nutrient ions by plants.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total solids increased in these loads from 8.20 to 10.28% (Table I), representing an increase of 25.4%, which is comparable to the change in TP (25.4 versus 26%). The relationship between TP and TS has been established by previous research (Picccini and Bortone, 1991;O'Dell et al, 1995;Rieck-Hinz et al, 1996;Scotford et al, 1998;Ndegwa et al, 2002). These data indicated that N based application rates are easy to achieve using manures from the same storage facility.…”
Section: Manure Nutrient Determination and Application Ratesmentioning
confidence: 68%