1990
DOI: 10.1029/gl017i001p00089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface‐based remote sensing of the observed and the Adiabatic liquid water content of stratocumulus clouds

Abstract: A laser ceilometer, an acoustic sounder, and a microwave radiometer were used to estimate cloud thickness and the adiabatic and integrated liquid water content of shallow stratocumulus clouds continuously for three days using two‐minute averages. Although the observed liquid water path was close to the theoretical adiabatic value for most of the three days, there was one four‐hour period when the liquid water content dropped to about 50% of the adiabatic value. Hourly‐averaged values for a 19‐day period of int… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
155
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(163 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
7
155
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus the maximum LWC in the retrieved cloud field is 30-40% of the adiabatic value. This fraction is consistent with many of the in-situ and remote sensing observations of marine low-level clouds (Albrecht et al, 1990;Miller et al, 1998). The spatial characteristics of the retrieved clouds around 30, 110, 140 and 160 km are consistent with those in the radar image (Fig.…”
Section: Retrieval Using Only the Psr Datasupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Thus the maximum LWC in the retrieved cloud field is 30-40% of the adiabatic value. This fraction is consistent with many of the in-situ and remote sensing observations of marine low-level clouds (Albrecht et al, 1990;Miller et al, 1998). The spatial characteristics of the retrieved clouds around 30, 110, 140 and 160 km are consistent with those in the radar image (Fig.…”
Section: Retrieval Using Only the Psr Datasupporting
confidence: 74%
“…However, in the VO-CALS dataset we have estimates of both cloud thickness and LWP. Cloud thickness is typically well correlated with cloud LWP for marine stratocumulus, where the assumption of adiabatic LWP is a good approximation (Albrecht et al, 1990;Zuidema et al, 2005Zuidema et al, , 2012. In some areas where there is scud (cumulus humulis under stratocumulus), the assumption of adiabatic LWP breaks down.…”
Section: Susceptibility When Binned By Cloud Liquid Water Pathmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assumption is typically valid in marine stratocumulus (Albrecht et al, 1990;Zuidema et al, 2005Zuidema et al, , 2012, and the approximation is especially good for the thinner, non-precipitating clouds for which the WCR is unable to detect a cloud top height (Zuidema et al, 2005). We estimate the cloud thickness h values from the cloud LWP values using the expression…”
Section: Susceptibility With Integrated Cloud Thickness Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…c is the rate of increase of liquid water content (q L ) with height (dq L /dz, with units kgm −4 ) and is referred to as the "condensation rate" in B07, or the "water content lapse rate" in Painemal and Zuidema (2011, hereafter PZ11). Albrecht et al (1990) and Ahmad et al (2013) give two alternative derivations of this quantity. c depends more strongly on the temperature (T ) than on the pressure (P ).…”
Section: Atmosmentioning
confidence: 99%