2016
DOI: 10.3934/matersci.2016.2.669
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface characteristics and damage distributions of diamond wire sawn wafers for silicon solar cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Saw damage induces residual stresses, compressive in nature in the range from −20 to −85 MPa including stresses having a component in both the x‐ and y‐coordinate directions, namely, σ xx and σ yy . When those stresses exceed the Si critical shear stress, they cause plastic deformation and/or micro cleavage . However, the presence of this local strain remaining after the sawing step can only explain the formation of the morphology B dislocations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Saw damage induces residual stresses, compressive in nature in the range from −20 to −85 MPa including stresses having a component in both the x‐ and y‐coordinate directions, namely, σ xx and σ yy . When those stresses exceed the Si critical shear stress, they cause plastic deformation and/or micro cleavage . However, the presence of this local strain remaining after the sawing step can only explain the formation of the morphology B dislocations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These cracks observed in wafers under Conditions A and B are median cracks caused because the abrasive grains pushed into the wafer surface during machining, and the crack length increased with increasing cut depth; thus, the crack length was shorter in those under Condition A compared with those under Condition B. 33,37) Figure 6(c) shows a cross-sectional SEM image of typical subsurface damage of wafers sliced under Condition C. The observed cracks were the same median cracks as those observed in those under Conditions A and B, although they were larger, with a different shape, and may have had a greater impact on the mechanical strength of the wafer. A large feed rate increases the cut depth, which increases the depth of subsurface damage but also increases the size of the cracks.…”
Section: Sawing Damage Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33,34) Those under Condition A had the smoothest surface, attributed to the low feed rate and fine abrasive grains, effectively reducing the cut depth. [35][36][37] Figure 5 shows SEM images of the surfaces for each wafer. Those sliced under each condition had a smooth surface obtained by ductile mode machining and saw marks consisting of dents and parallel grooves due to brittle fracture, whereas those sliced under Conditions B and C had deep grooves and dents and were significantly more damaged than those under Condition A.…”
Section: Sawing Damage Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scratching induces phase transformation, larger cracks, complex damage on a micron scale on the wafer surface, and forms periodic structures in the wire slicing direction. [17][18][19][20] The large cracks and surface damage are responsible for reducing the fracture strength of as-sawn wafers. In the past there were only few studies on fracture stress of c-Si wafers with thickness of 170-180 µm sawn from diamond and slurry wire technology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%