2014
DOI: 10.1021/ja506139u
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface Charge Mapping with a Nanopipette

Abstract: Nanopipettes are emerging as simple but powerful tools for probing chemistry at the nanoscale.In this contribution the use of nanopipettes for simultaneous surface charge mapping and topographical imaging is demonstrated, using a scanning ion conductance microscopy (SICM) format. When a nanopipette is positioned close to a surface in electrolyte solution the direct ion current (DC), driven by an applied bias between a quasi-reference counter electrode (QRCE) in the nanopipette and a second QRCE in the bulk sol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
208
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(210 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
208
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that by maintaining V = 0 on approach for topographical imaging in this work, the scenario of traditional SICM experiments is avoided where, based on recent work, 42,44 an applied bias upon approach to heterogeneously charged substrates, may result in a non-constant working distance and hence distorted topography (Figure 1c).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Note that by maintaining V = 0 on approach for topographical imaging in this work, the scenario of traditional SICM experiments is avoided where, based on recent work, 42,44 an applied bias upon approach to heterogeneously charged substrates, may result in a non-constant working distance and hence distorted topography (Figure 1c).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of bias, however, is known to lead to ICR inside the nanopipette itself [39][40][41] (when it is freely suspended in bulk) and a surface-induced rectification. 44 This causes a drastic change in the nanopipette conductance state depending on bias polarity and surface charge due to a significant change of ionic conductivities (and therefore, the overall resistance) within and near the tip opening (see Figure 3e and f for V values of +0.3 V and -0.3 V, respectively). In turn, the AC ion current components, particularly the phase shift, which are highly sensitive to the overall resistance, as…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[19][20][21] SICM is a sensitive tool for the detection of local ion fluxes, 22 but unlike some other electrochemical methods, does not require the analyte species to be electroactive, since the probe monitors conductivity changes in the confined region between the sample and the pipette opening. Thus, SICM has been used to study individual pores and ion channels in artificial and living cell membranes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[23][24][25][26][27] Measurements of ion flux through the pipette orifice can be also used to explore ion current rectification phenomena 28,29 at interfaces 30,31 opening up exciting opportunities to map spatial distributions of surface charge and to probe heterogeneous acid-base equilibria. 20,21 In this work we introduce new functional capabilities of ion conductance microscopy demonstrating its potential for imaging spatially distributed (electro)chemical reactions through the detection of ionic fluxes near active sites. We provide proof-of-concept applications of this technique for dynamic imaging of electrochemical reactions at electrodes, first by recording the ion conductance response to a series of voltammetric sweeps, over wide potential range, with the pipette at a set of coordinates (image pixels) to map out oxidation and reduction reactions occurring at the electrode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%